You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The latter is like an email, and the former is the Mastodon syntax we have come to expect. The remote follow UI should allow the former, and maybe even reject the latter.
Optional tangent: I'm not sure why this convention is used. I like how Matrix uses @user:host.tld since it doesn't have excess @ symbols. But then I wonder what was wrong with the email syntax to begin with... is this new way just to differentiate these names as a new thing which isn't email?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
fwiw, i got tripped up the first time i tried to do a remote follow and assumed it was @user@domain rather than user@domain. The reason Matrix has its weird @user:domain syntax is deliberately to avoid confusion of matrix IDs with email addresses (or JIDs, or SIP URIs, or ostatus IDs...)
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 9:16 PM Matthew Hodgson ***@***.***> wrote:
fwiw, i got tripped up the first time i tried to do a remote follow and
assumed it was @***@***.*** rather than ***@***.*** The reason Matrix
has its weird @user:domain syntax is deliberately to avoid confusion of
matrix IDs with email addresses (or JIDs, or SIP URIs, or ostatus IDs...)
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2528 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAORV__4ZFls9KVitpozVzO6rC1gG6cJks5r1oPngaJpZM4NKRUs>
.
For instance, normally my username is this:
But remote follow makes me type it like this:
The latter is like an email, and the former is the Mastodon syntax we have come to expect. The remote follow UI should allow the former, and maybe even reject the latter.
Optional tangent: I'm not sure why this convention is used. I like how Matrix uses
@user:host.tld
since it doesn't have excess @ symbols. But then I wonder what was wrong with the email syntax to begin with... is this new way just to differentiate these names as a new thing which isn't email?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: