Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
bpf: don't let ldimm64 leak map addresses on unprivileged
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The patch fixes two things at once:

1) It checks the env->allow_ptr_leaks and only prints the map address to
   the log if we have the privileges to do so, otherwise it just dumps 0
   as we would when kptr_restrict is enabled on %pK. Given the latter is
   off by default and not every distro sets it, I don't want to rely on
   this, hence the 0 by default for unprivileged.

2) Printing of ldimm64 in the verifier log is currently broken in that
   we don't print the full immediate, but only the 32 bit part of the
   first insn part for ldimm64. Thus, fix this up as well; it's okay to
   access, since we verified all ldimm64 earlier already (including just
   constants) through replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr().

Fixes: 1be7f75 ("bpf: enable non-root eBPF programs")
Fixes: cbd3570 ("bpf: verifier (add ability to receive verification log)")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
  • Loading branch information
borkmann authored and davem330 committed May 8, 2017
1 parent 871ff2e commit 0d0e576
Showing 1 changed file with 16 additions and 5 deletions.
21 changes: 16 additions & 5 deletions kernel/bpf/verifier.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -298,7 +298,8 @@ static const char *const bpf_jmp_string[16] = {
[BPF_EXIT >> 4] = "exit",
};

static void print_bpf_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn)
static void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
const struct bpf_insn *insn)
{
u8 class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code);

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -362,9 +363,19 @@ static void print_bpf_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn)
insn->code,
bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3],
insn->src_reg, insn->imm);
} else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_IMM) {
verbose("(%02x) r%d = 0x%x\n",
insn->code, insn->dst_reg, insn->imm);
} else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_IMM &&
BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW) {
/* At this point, we already made sure that the second
* part of the ldimm64 insn is accessible.
*/
u64 imm = ((u64)(insn + 1)->imm << 32) | (u32)insn->imm;
bool map_ptr = insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD;

if (map_ptr && !env->allow_ptr_leaks)
imm = 0;

verbose("(%02x) r%d = 0x%llx\n", insn->code,
insn->dst_reg, (unsigned long long)imm);
} else {
verbose("BUG_ld_%02x\n", insn->code);
return;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2853,7 +2864,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)

if (log_level) {
verbose("%d: ", insn_idx);
print_bpf_insn(insn);
print_bpf_insn(env, insn);
}

err = ext_analyzer_insn_hook(env, insn_idx, prev_insn_idx);
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 0d0e576

Please sign in to comment.