Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added usb-device desriptor for Sagem USB-Serial Controller #315

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

krajcovic
Copy link

Changes to be committed:
modified: drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
@krajcovic
Copy link
Author

dmesg
[ 1380.309578] usb 1-1.3: new full-speed USB device number 5 using dwc_otg
[ 1380.412944] usb 1-1.3: New USB device found, idVendor=079b, idProduct=0028

laijs pushed a commit to laijs/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2017
lkl: add LKL_HIJACK_NET_QDISC to configure qdisc policy
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2017
Fixed issues:
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
torvalds#71: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:71:
+       audio_info("alsa_stream=%p substream=%p\n", alsa_stream,
+               alsa_stream ? alsa_stream->substream : 0);

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
torvalds#262: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:262:
+static int snd_bcm2835_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
+       struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params)

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
torvalds#315: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:315:
+       err = bcm2835_audio_set_params(alsa_stream, channels,
+               alsa_stream->params_rate,

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
torvalds#384: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:384:
+               audio_debug("bcm2835_AUDIO_TRIGGER_START running=%d\n",
+                       alsa_stream->running);

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
torvalds#391: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:391:
+                                       bytes_to_frames(runtime,
+                                       alsa_stream->pos);

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
torvalds#436: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:436:
+       audio_debug("pcm_pointer... (%d) hwptr=%d appl=%d pos=%d\n", 0,
+               frames_to_bytes(runtime, runtime->status->hw_ptr),

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
torvalds#447: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:447:
+static int snd_bcm2835_pcm_lib_ioctl(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
+       unsigned int cmd, void *arg)

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
torvalds#452: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:452:
+       audio_info(" .. substream=%p, cmd=%d, arg=%p (%x) ret=%d\n", substream,
+               cmd, arg, arg ? *(unsigned *) arg : 0, ret);

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
torvalds#544: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:544:
+       snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pages_for_all(pcm, SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_CONTINUOUS,
+               snd_dma_continuous_data(GFP_KERNEL),

Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <sfaragnaus@gmail.com>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors:

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#19: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:19:
    +static struct COEX_DM_8723B_2ANT * pCoexDm = &GLCoexDm8723b2Ant;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#21: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:21:
    +static struct COEX_STA_8723B_2ANT * pCoexSta = &GLCoexSta8723b2Ant;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#111: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:111:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#192: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:192:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#215: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:215:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_MonitorBtCtr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#265: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:265:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_QueryBtInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#282: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:282:
    +static bool halbtc8723b2ant_IsWifiStatusChanged(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#313: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:313:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_UpdateBtLinkInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#315: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:315:
    +	struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#377: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:377:
    +static u8 halbtc8723b2ant_ActionAlgorithm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#379: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:379:
    +	struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#552: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:552:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 dacSwingLvl

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#576: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:576:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 decBtPwrLvl

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#597: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:597:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 decBtPwrLvl

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#631: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:631:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 fwDacSwingLvl

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#666: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:666:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#689: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:689:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bRxRfShrinkOn

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#723: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:723:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bLowPenaltyRa

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#751: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:751:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bLowPenaltyRa

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #785: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:785:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_SetDacSwingReg(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u32 level)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#798: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:798:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bSwDacSwingOn, u32 swDacSwingLvl

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#809: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:809:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#853: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:853:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bAgcTableEn

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#913: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:913:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bAgcTableEn

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #947: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:947:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #984: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:984:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1050: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1050:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 type

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1099: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1099:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bEnable

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1120: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1120:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bEnable

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1148: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1148:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1187: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1187:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1199: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1199:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1211: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1211:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 antPosType, bool bInitHwCfg, bool bWifiOff

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1214: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1214:
    +	struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1305: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1305:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bTurnOn, u8 type

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1437: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1437:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_CoexAllOff(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1453: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1453:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1465: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1465:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionBtInquiry(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1493: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1493:
    +static bool halbtc8723b2ant_IsCommonAction(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1594: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1594:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bScoHid, bool bTxPause, u8 maxInterval

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2044: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2044:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionSco(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2099: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2099:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionHid(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2160: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2160:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionA2dp(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2241: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2241:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionA2dpPanHs(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2291: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2291:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanEdr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2349: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2349:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanHs(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2399: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2399:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanEdrA2dp(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2460: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2460:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanEdrHid(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2524: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2524:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionHidA2dpPanEdr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2584: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2584:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionHidA2dp(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2659: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2659:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_RunCoexistMechanism(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2758: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2758:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_WifiOffHwCfg(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2783: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2783:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bBackUp)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2817: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2817:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2819: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2819:
    +	struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2869: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2869:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bWifiOnly)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2874: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2874:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2881: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2881:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_DisplayCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2883: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2883:
    +	struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2884: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2884:
    +	struct BTC_STACK_INFO * pStackInfo = &pBtCoexist->stackInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2885: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2885:
    +	struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3262: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3262:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3279: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3279:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3290: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3290:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3299: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3299:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3308: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3308:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3354: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3354:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3362: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3362:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3506: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3506:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3517: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3517:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3531: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3531:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors:

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#285: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:285:
    +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#287: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:287:
    +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#289: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:289:
    +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#291: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:291:
    +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#305: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:305:
    +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#309: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:309:
    +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#311: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:311:
    +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#313: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:313:
    +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#315: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:315:
    +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#323: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:323:
    +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#325: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:325:
    +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#327: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:327:
    +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:330:
    +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#338: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:338:
    +void odm_InitHybridAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#341: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:341:
    +	struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#349: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:349:
    +void odm_SetRxIdleAnt(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u8 Ant, bool bDualPath);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#353: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:353:
    +void odm_HwAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#363: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:363:
    +void ODM_DMInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#393: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:393:
    +void ODM_DMWatchdog(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#420: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:420:
    +		struct DIG_T * pDM_DigTable = &pDM_Odm->DM_DigTable;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#448: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:448:
    +void ODM_CmnInfoInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, u32 Value)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#560: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:560:
    +void ODM_CmnInfoHook(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, void *pValue)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#689: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:689:
    +	struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#717: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:717:
    +void ODM_CmnInfoUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u32 CmnInfo, u64 Value)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#831: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:831:
    +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#841: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:841:
    +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#867: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:867:
    +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#888: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:888:
    +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #935: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:935:
    +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #937: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:937:
    +	struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pOdmRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #953: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:953:
    +	struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1083: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1083:
    +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1094: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1094:
    +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1131: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1131:
    +	struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1137: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1137:
    +	struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1196: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1196:
    +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1198: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1198:
    +	struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1204: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1204:
    +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1217: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1217:
    +	struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm = &(pHalData->odmpriv);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1234: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1234:
    +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1243: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1243:
    +	struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1306: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1306:
    +static u8 getSwingIndex(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1330:
    +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1374: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1374:
    +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1398: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1398:
    +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1400: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1400:
    +	struct SWAT_T * pDM_SWAT_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_SWAT_Table;

Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors:

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#19: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:19:
    +static struct COEX_DM_8723B_2ANT * pCoexDm = &GLCoexDm8723b2Ant;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#21: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:21:
    +static struct COEX_STA_8723B_2ANT * pCoexSta = &GLCoexSta8723b2Ant;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#111: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:111:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#192: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:192:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#215: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:215:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_MonitorBtCtr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#265: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:265:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_QueryBtInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#282: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:282:
    +static bool halbtc8723b2ant_IsWifiStatusChanged(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#313: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:313:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_UpdateBtLinkInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#315: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:315:
    +	struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#377: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:377:
    +static u8 halbtc8723b2ant_ActionAlgorithm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#379: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:379:
    +	struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#552: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:552:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 dacSwingLvl

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#576: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:576:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 decBtPwrLvl

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#597: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:597:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 decBtPwrLvl

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#631: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:631:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 fwDacSwingLvl

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#666: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:666:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#689: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:689:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bRxRfShrinkOn

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#723: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:723:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bLowPenaltyRa

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#751: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:751:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bLowPenaltyRa

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #785: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:785:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_SetDacSwingReg(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u32 level)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#798: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:798:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bSwDacSwingOn, u32 swDacSwingLvl

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#809: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:809:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#853: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:853:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bAgcTableEn

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#913: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:913:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bAgcTableEn

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #947: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:947:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #984: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:984:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1050: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1050:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 type

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1099: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1099:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bEnable

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1120: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1120:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bEnable

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1148: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1148:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1187: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1187:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1199: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1199:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1211: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1211:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 antPosType, bool bInitHwCfg, bool bWifiOff

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1214: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1214:
    +	struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1305: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1305:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bTurnOn, u8 type

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1437: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1437:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_CoexAllOff(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1453: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1453:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1465: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1465:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionBtInquiry(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1493: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1493:
    +static bool halbtc8723b2ant_IsCommonAction(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1594: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1594:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bScoHid, bool bTxPause, u8 maxInterval

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2044: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2044:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionSco(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2099: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2099:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionHid(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2160: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2160:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionA2dp(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2241: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2241:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionA2dpPanHs(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2291: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2291:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanEdr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2349: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2349:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanHs(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2399: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2399:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanEdrA2dp(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2460: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2460:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanEdrHid(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2524: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2524:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionHidA2dpPanEdr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2584: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2584:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionHidA2dp(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2659: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2659:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_RunCoexistMechanism(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2758: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2758:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_WifiOffHwCfg(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2783: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2783:
    +static void halbtc8723b2ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bBackUp)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2817: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2817:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2819: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2819:
    +	struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2869: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2869:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bWifiOnly)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2874: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2874:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2881: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2881:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_DisplayCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2883: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2883:
    +	struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2884: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2884:
    +	struct BTC_STACK_INFO * pStackInfo = &pBtCoexist->stackInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #2885: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2885:
    +	struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3262: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3262:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3279: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3279:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3290: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3290:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3299: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3299:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3308: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3308:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3354: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3354:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3362: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3362:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3506: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3506:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3517: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3517:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #3531: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3531:
    +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist)

Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210315170618.2566-5-marcocesati@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors:

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#285: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:285:
    +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#287: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:287:
    +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#289: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:289:
    +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#291: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:291:
    +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#305: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:305:
    +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#309: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:309:
    +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#311: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:311:
    +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#313: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:313:
    +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#315: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:315:
    +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#323: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:323:
    +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#325: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:325:
    +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#327: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:327:
    +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:330:
    +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#338: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:338:
    +void odm_InitHybridAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#341: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:341:
    +	struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#349: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:349:
    +void odm_SetRxIdleAnt(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u8 Ant, bool bDualPath);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#353: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:353:
    +void odm_HwAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#363: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:363:
    +void ODM_DMInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#393: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:393:
    +void ODM_DMWatchdog(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#420: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:420:
    +		struct DIG_T * pDM_DigTable = &pDM_Odm->DM_DigTable;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#448: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:448:
    +void ODM_CmnInfoInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, u32 Value)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#560: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:560:
    +void ODM_CmnInfoHook(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, void *pValue)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#689: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:689:
    +	struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#717: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:717:
    +void ODM_CmnInfoUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u32 CmnInfo, u64 Value)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#831: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:831:
    +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#841: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:841:
    +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#867: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:867:
    +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#888: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:888:
    +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #935: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:935:
    +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #937: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:937:
    +	struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pOdmRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #953: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:953:
    +	struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1083: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1083:
    +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1094: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1094:
    +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1131: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1131:
    +	struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm,

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1137: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1137:
    +	struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1196: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1196:
    +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1198: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1198:
    +	struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1204: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1204:
    +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1217: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1217:
    +	struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm = &(pHalData->odmpriv);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1234: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1234:
    +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1243: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1243:
    +	struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table;

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1306: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1306:
    +static u8 getSwingIndex(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1330:
    +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1374: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1374:
    +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1398: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1398:
    +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm)

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    #1400: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1400:
    +	struct SWAT_T * pDM_SWAT_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_SWAT_Table;

Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210315170618.2566-21-marcocesati@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2021
…format

For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting
of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent.

Before fix:
< HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  #2196 [hci0] 321.342548
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4               #2197 [hci0] 321.343585
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17  #2198 [hci0] 321.351666
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
........
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2336 [hci0] 321.383655
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2337 [hci0] 321.389558
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2338 [hci0] 321.393615
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2339 [hci0] 321.393618
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2340 [hci0] 321.393618
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2341 [hci0] 321.397070
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2342 [hci0] 321.403622
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2343 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2344 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2345 [hci0] 321.403625
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2346 [hci0] 321.404569
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2347 [hci0] 321.412091
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2348 [hci0] 321.413626
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2349 [hci0] 321.413630
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2350 [hci0] 321.413630
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2351 [hci0] 321.419674

After fix:

< HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4                 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17  torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927
> HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3               torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345
        Handle: 256
        Max slots: 5
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311

Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request May 7, 2021
…format

For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting
of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent.

Before fix:
< HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  #2196 [hci0] 321.342548
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4               #2197 [hci0] 321.343585
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17  #2198 [hci0] 321.351666
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
........
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2336 [hci0] 321.383655
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2337 [hci0] 321.389558
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2338 [hci0] 321.393615
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2339 [hci0] 321.393618
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2340 [hci0] 321.393618
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2341 [hci0] 321.397070
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2342 [hci0] 321.403622
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2343 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2344 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2345 [hci0] 321.403625
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2346 [hci0] 321.404569
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2347 [hci0] 321.412091
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2348 [hci0] 321.413626
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2349 [hci0] 321.413630
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2350 [hci0] 321.413630
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2351 [hci0] 321.419674

After fix:

< HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4                 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17  torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927
> HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3               torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345
        Handle: 256
        Max slots: 5
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311

Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
roxell pushed a commit to roxell/linux that referenced this pull request May 10, 2021
…format

For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting
of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent.

Before fix:
< HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  #2196 [hci0] 321.342548
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4               #2197 [hci0] 321.343585
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17  #2198 [hci0] 321.351666
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
........
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2336 [hci0] 321.383655
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2337 [hci0] 321.389558
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2338 [hci0] 321.393615
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2339 [hci0] 321.393618
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2340 [hci0] 321.393618
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2341 [hci0] 321.397070
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2342 [hci0] 321.403622
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2343 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2344 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2345 [hci0] 321.403625
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2346 [hci0] 321.404569
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2347 [hci0] 321.412091
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2348 [hci0] 321.413626
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2349 [hci0] 321.413630
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2350 [hci0] 321.413630
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2351 [hci0] 321.419674

After fix:

< HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4                 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17  torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927
> HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3               torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345
        Handle: 256
        Max slots: 5
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311

Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2021
…format

For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting
of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent.

Before fix:
< HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  #2196 [hci0] 321.342548
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4               #2197 [hci0] 321.343585
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17  #2198 [hci0] 321.351666
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
........
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2336 [hci0] 321.383655
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2337 [hci0] 321.389558
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2338 [hci0] 321.393615
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2339 [hci0] 321.393618
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2340 [hci0] 321.393618
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2341 [hci0] 321.397070
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2342 [hci0] 321.403622
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2343 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2344 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2345 [hci0] 321.403625
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2346 [hci0] 321.404569
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2347 [hci0] 321.412091
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2348 [hci0] 321.413626
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2349 [hci0] 321.413630
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2350 [hci0] 321.413630
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2351 [hci0] 321.419674

After fix:

< HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4                 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17  torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927
> HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3               torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345
        Handle: 256
        Max slots: 5
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311

Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
intersectRaven pushed a commit to intersectRaven/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2021
…format

[ Upstream commit 06d213d ]

For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting
of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent.

Before fix:
< HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  #2196 [hci0] 321.342548
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4               #2197 [hci0] 321.343585
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17  #2198 [hci0] 321.351666
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
........
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2336 [hci0] 321.383655
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2337 [hci0] 321.389558
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2338 [hci0] 321.393615
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2339 [hci0] 321.393618
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2340 [hci0] 321.393618
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2341 [hci0] 321.397070
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2342 [hci0] 321.403622
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2343 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2344 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2345 [hci0] 321.403625
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2346 [hci0] 321.404569
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2347 [hci0] 321.412091
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2348 [hci0] 321.413626
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2349 [hci0] 321.413630
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2350 [hci0] 321.413630
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2351 [hci0] 321.419674

After fix:

< HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4                 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17  torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927
> HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3               torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345
        Handle: 256
        Max slots: 5
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311

Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
damentz referenced this pull request in zen-kernel/zen-kernel Jul 19, 2021
…format

[ Upstream commit 06d213d ]

For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting
of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent.

Before fix:
< HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  #2196 [hci0] 321.342548
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4               #2197 [hci0] 321.343585
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17  #2198 [hci0] 321.351666
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
........
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2336 [hci0] 321.383655
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2337 [hci0] 321.389558
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2338 [hci0] 321.393615
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2339 [hci0] 321.393618
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2340 [hci0] 321.393618
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2341 [hci0] 321.397070
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2342 [hci0] 321.403622
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2343 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2344 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2345 [hci0] 321.403625
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2346 [hci0] 321.404569
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2347 [hci0] 321.412091
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2348 [hci0] 321.413626
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2349 [hci0] 321.413630
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2350 [hci0] 321.413630
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2351 [hci0] 321.419674

After fix:

< HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  #309 [hci0] 49.439693
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4                 #310 [hci0] 49.440308
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17  #311 [hci0] 49.449308
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #312 [hci0] 49.450421
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #313 [hci0] 49.457927
> HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3               #314 [hci0] 49.460345
        Handle: 256
        Max slots: 5
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #315 [hci0] 49.465453
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #316 [hci0] 49.470502
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #317 [hci0] 49.470519
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #318 [hci0] 49.472996
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #319 [hci0] 49.480412
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #320 [hci0] 49.480492
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #321 [hci0] 49.487989
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #322 [hci0] 49.490303
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #323 [hci0] 49.495496
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #324 [hci0] 49.500304
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #325 [hci0] 49.500311

Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
repojohnray pushed a commit to repojohnray/linux-sunxi-4.7.y that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2021
…format

[ Upstream commit 06d213d ]

For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting
of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent.

Before fix:
< HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  #2196 [hci0] 321.342548
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4               #2197 [hci0] 321.343585
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17  #2198 [hci0] 321.351666
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
........
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2336 [hci0] 321.383655
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2337 [hci0] 321.389558
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2338 [hci0] 321.393615
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2339 [hci0] 321.393618
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2340 [hci0] 321.393618
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2341 [hci0] 321.397070
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2342 [hci0] 321.403622
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2343 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2344 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2345 [hci0] 321.403625
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2346 [hci0] 321.404569
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2347 [hci0] 321.412091
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2348 [hci0] 321.413626
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2349 [hci0] 321.413630
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2350 [hci0] 321.413630
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2351 [hci0] 321.419674

After fix:

< HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4                 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17  torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927
> HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3               torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345
        Handle: 256
        Max slots: 5
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311

Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
akiernan pushed a commit to zuma-array/linux that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2022
PD#150075: driver defect clean up:
 vdac_dev.c:
#5
torvalds#6
torvalds#876
 tv_vout.c:
torvalds#181
torvalds#267
torvalds#311
torvalds#312
torvalds#313
torvalds#314
torvalds#315
torvalds#532
torvalds#605

Change-Id: I185072efb68df1abdad036a21867bb64efca914c
Signed-off-by: Nian Jing <nian.jing@amlogic.com>
akiernan pushed a commit to zuma-array/linux that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2022
PD#150075: driver defect clean up:
 vdac_dev.c:
#5
torvalds#6
torvalds#876
 tv_vout.c:
torvalds#181
torvalds#267
torvalds#311
torvalds#312
torvalds#313
torvalds#314
torvalds#315
torvalds#532
torvalds#605

Change-Id: I185072efb68df1abdad036a21867bb64efca914c
Signed-off-by: Nian Jing <nian.jing@amlogic.com>
jonhunter pushed a commit to jonhunter/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2024
In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the
generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words,
resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test:

[ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS
[ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS

Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32.

Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
luigi311 pushed a commit to luigi311/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2024
In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the
generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words,
resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test:

[ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS
[ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS

Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32.

Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
luigi311 pushed a commit to luigi311/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2024
In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the
generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words,
resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test:

[ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS
[ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS

Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32.

Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Kaz205 pushed a commit to Kaz205/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ]

In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the
generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words,
resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test:

[ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS
[ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS

Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32.

Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mj22226 pushed a commit to mj22226/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ]

In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the
generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words,
resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test:

[ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS
[ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS

Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32.

Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Kaz205 pushed a commit to Kaz205/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ]

In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the
generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words,
resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test:

[ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS
[ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS

Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32.

Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
heiher pushed a commit to heiher/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024
[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ]

In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the
generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words,
resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test:

[ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS
[ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS

Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32.

Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
1054009064 pushed a commit to 1054009064/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024
[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ]

In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the
generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words,
resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test:

[ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS
[ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS

Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32.

Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mpe pushed a commit to linuxppc/linux that referenced this pull request May 7, 2024
Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module
exhibits the following failures:

  test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 301 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 555 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 268 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 269 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 460 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 320 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 222 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 273 PASS

  test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B
  eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 432 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H
  eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 381 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W
  eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 505 PASS

  test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1
  eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported
  jited:0 261 PASS

  test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed]

Fix them by adding missing processing.

Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Kaz205 pushed a commit to Kaz205/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2024
[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ]

Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module
exhibits the following failures:

  test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 301 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 555 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 268 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 269 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 460 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 320 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 222 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 273 PASS

  test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B
  eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 432 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H
  eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 381 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W
  eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 505 PASS

  test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1
  eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported
  jited:0 261 PASS

  test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed]

Fix them by adding missing processing.

Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Kaz205 pushed a commit to Kaz205/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ]

Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module
exhibits the following failures:

  test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 301 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 555 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 268 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 269 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 460 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 320 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 222 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 273 PASS

  test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B
  eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 432 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H
  eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 381 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W
  eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 505 PASS

  test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1
  eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported
  jited:0 261 PASS

  test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed]

Fix them by adding missing processing.

Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
hdeller pushed a commit to hdeller/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2024
[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ]

Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module
exhibits the following failures:

  test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 301 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 555 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 268 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 269 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 460 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 320 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 222 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 273 PASS

  test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B
  eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 432 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H
  eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 381 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W
  eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 505 PASS

  test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1
  eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported
  jited:0 261 PASS

  test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed]

Fix them by adding missing processing.

Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
john-cabaj pushed a commit to UbuntuAsahi/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2024
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065400

[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ]

In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the
generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words,
resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test:

[ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS
[ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS

Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32.

Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Manuel Diewald <manuel.diewald@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <roxana.nicolescu@canonical.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
1 participant