-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix DCCP charter URL at dccp.txt #717
Conversation
Hi @dimmo! Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel! Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch. Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process. Here's what to do:
How do I format my contribution?The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations. Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea. You can create patches with Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary. Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with. Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel. Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this. Where do I send my contribution?The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes. If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the
Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches. It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.) How do I send my contribution?Use For more information about using How do I get help if I'm stuck?Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed. Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine. If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:
If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers! I sent my patch - now what?You wait. You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at. Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:
Further information
Happy hacking! This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good
As we unwind the requests for a preemption event, we return a virtual request back to its original virtual engine (so that it is available for execution on any of its siblings). In the process, this means that its breadcrumb should no longer be associated with the original physical engine, and so we are forced to decouple it. Previously, as the request could not complete without our awareness, we would move it to the next real engine without any danger. However, preempt-to-busy allowed for requests to continue on the HW and complete in the background as we unwound, which meant that we could end up retiring the request before fixing up the breadcrumb link. [51679.517943] INFO: trying to register non-static key. [51679.517956] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. [51679.517960] turning off the locking correctness validator. [51679.517966] CPU: 0 PID: 3270 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Tainted: G U 5.2.0+ torvalds#717 [51679.517971] Hardware name: Intel Corporation NUC7i5BNK/NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0052.2017.0918.1346 09/18/2017 [51679.518012] Workqueue: i915 retire_work_handler [i915] [51679.518017] Call Trace: [51679.518026] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [51679.518031] register_lock_class+0x52c/0x540 [51679.518038] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [51679.518042] __lock_acquire+0x68/0x1800 [51679.518047] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [51679.518073] ? __i915_sw_fence_complete+0xff/0x1c0 [i915] [51679.518079] lock_acquire+0x90/0x170 [51679.518105] ? i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb+0x29/0x160 [i915] [51679.518112] _raw_spin_lock+0x27/0x40 [51679.518138] ? i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb+0x29/0x160 [i915] [51679.518165] i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb+0x29/0x160 [i915] [51679.518199] i915_request_retire+0x43f/0x530 [i915] [51679.518232] retire_requests+0x4d/0x60 [i915] [51679.518263] i915_retire_requests+0xdf/0x1f0 [i915] [51679.518294] retire_work_handler+0x4c/0x60 [i915] [51679.518301] process_one_work+0x22c/0x5c0 [51679.518307] worker_thread+0x37/0x390 [51679.518311] ? process_one_work+0x5c0/0x5c0 [51679.518316] kthread+0x116/0x130 [51679.518320] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40 [51679.518325] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [51679.520177] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [51679.520189] list_del corruption, ffff88883675e2f0->next is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000000100) Fixes: 22b7a42 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190716124931.5870-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#285: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:285: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#287: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:287: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#289: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:289: +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#291: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:291: +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#305: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:305: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#309: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:309: +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#311: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:311: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#313: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:313: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#315: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:315: +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#323: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:323: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#325: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:325: +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#327: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:327: +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:330: +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#338: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:338: +void odm_InitHybridAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#341: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:341: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#349: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:349: +void odm_SetRxIdleAnt(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u8 Ant, bool bDualPath); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#353: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:353: +void odm_HwAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#363: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:363: +void ODM_DMInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#393: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:393: +void ODM_DMWatchdog(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#420: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:420: + struct DIG_T * pDM_DigTable = &pDM_Odm->DM_DigTable; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#448: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:448: +void ODM_CmnInfoInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, u32 Value) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#560: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:560: +void ODM_CmnInfoHook(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, void *pValue) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#689: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:689: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#717: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:717: +void ODM_CmnInfoUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u32 CmnInfo, u64 Value) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#831: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:831: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#841: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:841: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#867: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:867: +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#888: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:888: +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#935: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:935: +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#937: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:937: + struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pOdmRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#953: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:953: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1083: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1083: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1094: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1094: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1131: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1131: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1137: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1137: + struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1196: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1196: +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1198: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1198: + struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1204: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1204: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1217: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1217: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm = &(pHalData->odmpriv); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1234: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1234: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1243: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1243: + struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1306: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1306: +static u8 getSwingIndex(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1330: +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1374: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1374: +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1398: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1398: +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1400: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1400: + struct SWAT_T * pDM_SWAT_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_SWAT_Table; Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com>
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#285: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:285: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#287: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:287: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#289: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:289: +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#291: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:291: +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#305: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:305: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#309: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:309: +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#311: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:311: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#313: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:313: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#315: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:315: +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#323: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:323: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#325: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:325: +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#327: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:327: +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:330: +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#338: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:338: +void odm_InitHybridAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#341: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:341: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#349: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:349: +void odm_SetRxIdleAnt(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u8 Ant, bool bDualPath); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#353: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:353: +void odm_HwAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#363: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:363: +void ODM_DMInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#393: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:393: +void ODM_DMWatchdog(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#420: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:420: + struct DIG_T * pDM_DigTable = &pDM_Odm->DM_DigTable; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#448: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:448: +void ODM_CmnInfoInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, u32 Value) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#560: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:560: +void ODM_CmnInfoHook(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, void *pValue) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#689: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:689: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#717: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:717: +void ODM_CmnInfoUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u32 CmnInfo, u64 Value) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#831: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:831: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#841: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:841: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#867: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:867: +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#888: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:888: +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#935: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:935: +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#937: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:937: + struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pOdmRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#953: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:953: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1083: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1083: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1094: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1094: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1131: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1131: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1137: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1137: + struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1196: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1196: +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1198: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1198: + struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1204: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1204: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1217: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1217: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm = &(pHalData->odmpriv); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1234: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1234: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1243: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1243: + struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1306: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1306: +static u8 getSwingIndex(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1330: +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1374: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1374: +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1398: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1398: +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1400: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1400: + struct SWAT_T * pDM_SWAT_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_SWAT_Table; Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210315170618.2566-21-marcocesati@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rust: add a simple Rust mutex implementation
No description provided.