Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add grub of bootloader list in INITRD help #501

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add grub of bootloader list in INITRD help #501

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tazou
Copy link

@tazou tazou commented Dec 22, 2017

Hello,
Just to add grub in the help list of INITRD in "CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD" section.
Best regards,
Thanks.

@KernelPRBot
Copy link

Hi @tazou!

Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel!

Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch.

Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process.

Here's what to do:

  • Format your contribution according to kernel requirements
  • Decide who to send your contribution to
  • Set up your system to send your contribution as an email
  • Send your contribution and wait for feedback

How do I format my contribution?

The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations.

Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea.

You can create patches with git format-patch.

Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary.

Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with.

Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel.

Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this.

Who do I send my contribution to?

The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes.

If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the get_maintainer.pl script in the kernel source can help you.

get_maintainer.pl will take the patch or patches you created in the previous step, and tell you who is responsible for them, and what mailing lists are used. You can also take a look at the MAINTAINERS file by hand.

Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches.

It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.)

How do I send my contribution?

Use git send-email, which will ensure that your patches are formatted in the standard manner. In order to use git send-email, you'll need to configure git to use your SMTP email server.

For more information about using git send-email, look at the Git documentation or type git help send-email. There are a number of useful guides and tutorials about git send-email that can be found on the internet.

How do I get help if I'm stuck?

Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed.

Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine.

If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:

If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers!

I sent my patch - now what?

You wait.

You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at.

Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:

  • You might get a response to your email. Often these will be comments, which may require you to make changes to your patch, or explain why your way is the best way. You should respond to these comments, and you may need to submit another revision of your patch to address the issues raised.
  • Your patch might be merged into the subsystem tree. Code that becomes part of Linux isn't merged into the main repository straight away - it first goes into the subsystem tree, which is managed by the subsystem maintainer. It is then batched up with a number of other changes sent to Linus for inclusion. (This process is described in some detail in the kernel development process guide).
  • Your patch might be ignored completely. This happens sometimes - don't take it personally. Here's what to do:
    • Wait a bit more - patches often take several weeks to get a response; more if they were sent at a busy time.
    • Kernel developers often silently ignore patches that break the rules. Check for obvious violations of the Submitting Patches guidelines, the style guidelines, and any other documentation you can find about your subsystem. Check that you're sending your patch to the right place.
    • Try again later. When you resend it, don't add angry commentary, as that will get your patch ignored. It might also get you silently blacklisted.

Further information

Happy hacking!

This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot.

krzk pushed a commit to krzk/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2019
If a macro is in CamelCase, it it converted to upper case. Variables
and routine names are converted to lower case.

The following checkpatch exceptions are also fixed:

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#316: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/fw.c:1751:
+       SET_8821AE_H2CCMD_AOAC_RSVDPAGE_LOC_GTK_EXT_MEM(u1rsvdpageloc2, GTKEXT_PG);

CHECK: spaces preferred around that '+' (ctx:VxV)
torvalds#357: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2591:
+                (eeaddr+1), hwinfo[eeaddr+1]);
                        ^

CHECK: spaces preferred around that '+' (ctx:VxV)
torvalds#357: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2591:
+                (eeaddr+1), hwinfo[eeaddr+1]);
                                          ^

CHECK: spaces preferred around that '+' (ctx:VxV)
torvalds#358: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2592:
+       if (0xFF == hwinfo[eeaddr+1])  /*YJ,add,120316*/
                                 ^

WARNING: Comparisons should place the constant on the right side of the test
torvalds#358: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2592:
+       if (0xFF == hwinfo[eeaddr+1])  /*YJ,add,120316*/

CHECK: spaces preferred around that '&' (ctx:VxV)
torvalds#501: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2666:
+                               pwrinfo24g->bw40_diff[rfpath][txcount] = (hwinfo[eeaddr]&0xf0) >> 4;
                                                                                        ^
Note that not all checkpatch exceptions are addressed. Those will be
handled in later patches.

Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2019
If a macro is in CamelCase, it it converted to upper case. Variables
and routine names are converted to lower case.

The following checkpatch exceptions are also fixed:

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#316: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/fw.c:1751:
+       SET_8821AE_H2CCMD_AOAC_RSVDPAGE_LOC_GTK_EXT_MEM(u1rsvdpageloc2, GTKEXT_PG);

CHECK: spaces preferred around that '+' (ctx:VxV)
torvalds#357: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2591:
+                (eeaddr+1), hwinfo[eeaddr+1]);
                        ^

CHECK: spaces preferred around that '+' (ctx:VxV)
torvalds#357: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2591:
+                (eeaddr+1), hwinfo[eeaddr+1]);
                                          ^

CHECK: spaces preferred around that '+' (ctx:VxV)
torvalds#358: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2592:
+       if (0xFF == hwinfo[eeaddr+1])  /*YJ,add,120316*/
                                 ^

WARNING: Comparisons should place the constant on the right side of the test
torvalds#358: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2592:
+       if (0xFF == hwinfo[eeaddr+1])  /*YJ,add,120316*/

CHECK: spaces preferred around that '&' (ctx:VxV)
torvalds#501: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2666:
+                               pwrinfo24g->bw40_diff[rfpath][txcount] = (hwinfo[eeaddr]&0xf0) >> 4;
                                                                                        ^
Note that not all checkpatch exceptions are addressed. Those will be
handled in later patches.

Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
sodar pushed a commit to sodar/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2021
rust: add `try_pin` under `no_global_oom_handling`
gatieme pushed a commit to gatieme/linux that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2022
ANBZ: torvalds#501

commit 368c548 upstream.

__io_kill_linked_timeout() sets REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED for a linked timeout
even if it can't cancel it, e.g. it's already running. It not only races
with io_link_timeout_fn() for ->flags field, but also leaves the flag
set and so io_link_timeout_fn() may find it and decide that it holds the
lock. Hopefully, the second problem is potential.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
gatieme pushed a commit to gatieme/linux that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2022
ANBZ: torvalds#501

commit b1b74cf upstream.

If a request had REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT it would've been cleared in
__io_kill_linked_timeout() by the time of __io_fail_links(), so no need
to care about it.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
gatieme pushed a commit to gatieme/linux that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2022
ANBZ: torvalds#501

commit 4edf20f upstream.

io_req_clean_work() checks REQ_F_COMP_LOCK to pass this two layers up.
Move the check up into __io_free_req(), so at least it doesn't looks so
ugly and would facilitate further changes.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
[joe: code conflicts fixes]
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
gatieme pushed a commit to gatieme/linux that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2022
ANBZ: torvalds#501

commit 216578e upstream.

REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED is used and implemented in a buggy way. The problem is
that the flag is set before io_put_req() but not cleared after, and if
that wasn't the final reference, the request will be freed with the flag
set from some other context, which may not hold a spinlock. That means
possible races with removing linked timeouts and unsynchronised
completion (e.g. access to CQ).

Instead of fixing REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED, kill the flag and use
task_work_add() to move such requests to a fresh context to free from
it, as was done with __io_free_req_finish().

[ANCK backport notes]
The core idea is defer req put into a task work. So fix code conflicts
based on it.
BTW, adjust __io_free_req() a bit.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
gatieme pushed a commit to gatieme/linux that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2022
ANBZ: torvalds#501

commit 9ae1f8d upstream.

WARNING: inconsistent lock state

inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
syz-executor217/8450 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
ffff888023d6e620 (&fs->lock){?.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
ffff888023d6e620 (&fs->lock){?.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_req_clean_work fs/io_uring.c:1398 [inline]
ffff888023d6e620 (&fs->lock){?.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_dismantle_req+0x66f/0xf60 fs/io_uring.c:2029

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&fs->lock);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&fs->lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor217/8450:
 #0: ffff88802417c3e8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0x1071/0x1f30 fs/io_uring.c:9442

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 8450 Comm: syz-executor217 Not tainted 5.11.0-rc5-next-20210129-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
[...]
 _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:151
 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
 io_req_clean_work fs/io_uring.c:1398 [inline]
 io_dismantle_req+0x66f/0xf60 fs/io_uring.c:2029
 __io_free_req+0x3d/0x2e0 fs/io_uring.c:2046
 io_free_req fs/io_uring.c:2269 [inline]
 io_double_put_req fs/io_uring.c:2392 [inline]
 io_put_req+0xf9/0x570 fs/io_uring.c:2388
 io_link_timeout_fn+0x30c/0x480 fs/io_uring.c:6497
 __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1519 [inline]
 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x609/0xe40 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1583
 hrtimer_interrupt+0x334/0x940 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1645
 local_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1085 [inline]
 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x146/0x540 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1102
 asm_call_irq_on_stack+0xf/0x20
 </IRQ>
 __run_sysvec_on_irqstack arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h:37 [inline]
 run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h:89 [inline]
 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xbd/0x100 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1096
 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:629
RIP: 0010:__raw_spin_unlock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:169 [inline]
RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x25/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:199
 spin_unlock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:404 [inline]
 io_queue_linked_timeout+0x194/0x1f0 fs/io_uring.c:6525
 __io_queue_sqe+0x328/0x1290 fs/io_uring.c:6594
 io_queue_sqe+0x631/0x10d0 fs/io_uring.c:6639
 io_queue_link_head fs/io_uring.c:6650 [inline]
 io_submit_sqe fs/io_uring.c:6697 [inline]
 io_submit_sqes+0x19b5/0x2720 fs/io_uring.c:6960
 __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0x107d/0x1f30 fs/io_uring.c:9443
 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Don't free requests from under hrtimer context (softirq) as it may sleep
or take spinlocks improperly (e.g. non-irq versions).

[ANCK backport notes]
Since the original patch cannot apply cleanly, we do it just like
linux-5.10.y stable branch.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.6+
Reported-by: syzbot+81d17233a2b02eafba33@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2024
Matthieu Baerts says:

====================
mptcp: fix signal endpoint readd

Issue torvalds#501 [1] showed that the Netlink PM currently doesn't correctly
support removal and re-add of signal endpoints.

Patches 1 and 2 address the issue: the first one in the userspace path-
manager, introduced in v5.19 ; and the second one in the in-kernel path-
manager, introduced in v5.7.

Patch 3 introduces a related selftest. There is no 'Fixes' tag, because
it might be hard to backport it automatically, as missing helpers in
Bash will not be caught when compiling the kernel or the selftests.

The last two patches address two small issues in the MPTCP selftests,
one introduced in v6.6., and the other one in v5.17.

Link: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#501 [1]
====================

Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants