APT whitelist request for fglrx

[BanzaiMan]

This replaces travis-ci/travis-ci#4228.

The original text by @safl follows

---

[BanzaiMan]

Ran tests and found setuid bits by purely textual search. Further analysis is required.

If these are found to be benign, add:

fglrx fglrx-dev fglrx-amdcccle

See https://travis-ci.org/travis-ci/apt-whitelist-checker/builds/72545436.

[safl]

Any news on this one? Can I help move it forward?

[Polytonic]

Likewise, is there anything I can do to get help move this forward?

[ntessore]

👍 waiting for an update on this

[BanzaiMan]

As the offending bits were found in binary files, I don't know if we can enable this. Sorry.

[ntessore]

Thanks for your answer. In that case, what other options do we have to test OpenCL code using the container infrastructure?

[BanzaiMan]

There isn't. The recent "Docker" infrastructure is on a different infrastructure, and you can use sudo there to install this.

http://docs.travis-ci.com/user/docker/

[Polytonic]

@ntessore I've had some success with testing OpenCL code using the OSX build machines. I'm not sure if I'm breaking any rules here though.

I'm using the legacy infrastructure (set language: objective-c) currently. I'd like to use the container infrastructure with the os: osx option, but apparently that's whitelist/opt-in right now?

[BanzaiMan]

language: objective-c sends the job to the Mac infrastructure, which is completely different form any Linux (legacy, container, Docker) one.

[travisbot]

This is an automated comment.

Ran tests and found setuid bits by purely textual search. Further analysis is required.

If these are found to be benign, examine http://github.com/travis-ci/apt-package-whitelist/compare/test-apt-package-whitelist-383 and its PR.

Packages found: fglrx fglrx-dev fglrx-amdcccle

See https://travis-ci.org/travis-ci/apt-whitelist-checker/builds/440489958 for details.