fix: fix mismatched parenthesis when && is used

[slackner]

@amaanq This fixes an issue introduced by the recent changes in #3070

Tree-sitter 0.22.2 generates the following incorrect code:

      if (lookahead == '-' ||
          ('A' <= lookahead && lookahead <= 'Z') ||
          lookahead == '_' ||
          ('a' <= lookahead && lookahead <= 'z')) ADVANCE(244);
      if (!eof && (0 <= lookahead && lookahead <= 8) ||
          (14 <= lookahead && lookahead <= 31) ||
          (lookahead == '"' ||
          lookahead == '\'' ||
          lookahead == '\\' ||
          (127 <= lookahead && lookahead <= 159)) ADVANCE(381);
      if (lookahead != 0 &&
          (lookahead < '\t' || ' ' < lookahead) &&
          lookahead != '(' &&
          lookahead != ')') ADVANCE(245);

Note that for the middle if, the parenthesis are not balanced and compilation fails.
With this change, it looks good again:

      if (lookahead == '-' ||
          ('A' <= lookahead && lookahead <= 'Z') ||
          lookahead == '_' ||
          ('a' <= lookahead && lookahead <= 'z')) ADVANCE(244);
      if ((!eof && (0 <= lookahead && lookahead <= 8)) ||
          (14 <= lookahead && lookahead <= 31) ||
          lookahead == '"' ||
          lookahead == '\'' ||
          lookahead == '\\' ||
          (127 <= lookahead && lookahead <= 159)) ADVANCE(381);
      if (lookahead != 0 &&
          (lookahead < '\t' || ' ' < lookahead) &&
          lookahead != '(' &&
          lookahead != ')') ADVANCE(245);

Feel free to adjust the PR / create your own one, if a different approach is preferred.

[slackner]

Note that it would probably also be valid to generate code like this, if preferred: !eof && (... all conditions ...). !eof is only relevant for the check lookahead == 0 if I understand the code correctly, but it also doesn't hurt for the other range checks.

[amaanq]

yeah my initial intention was to wrap every condition, but you're right that only the condition that's checking if the lookahead is 0 is needed anyways, thanks