New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix dedent for t and ngettext #67

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 23, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@AlexMost
Member

AlexMost commented May 22, 2017

Regarding to this issue - #66.

There is no need for jt fix, because it is used in scope of html markup so all dedent symbols are not displayed.
@alxpy @MrOrz

AlexMost added some commits May 21, 2017

@codecov

This comment has been minimized.

codecov bot commented May 22, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #67 into master will increase coverage by 0.25%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #67      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.21%   75.47%   +0.25%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines         573      579       +6     
  Branches       96       98       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits          431      437       +6     
  Misses        142      142
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/index.js 76.05% <100%> (+0.69%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 14452be...e47db38. Read the comment docs.

@AlexMost AlexMost merged commit e118974 into master May 23, 2017

3 checks passed

codecov/patch 100% of diff hit (target 75.47%)
Details
codecov/project 75.47% (+0%) compared to 42edbb5
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build passed
Details

@AlexMost AlexMost deleted the fix-dedent branch May 23, 2017

@AlexMost AlexMost referenced this pull request May 23, 2017

Closed

Multiline match problem #66

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment