Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 20, 2022. It is now read-only.

Moves shared code out of core/storm to the online package for use with o... #299

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 15, 2013

Conversation

ianoc
Copy link
Collaborator

@ianoc ianoc commented Oct 14, 2013

...ther planners/more general purpose code

Move non-specific storm code out of the storm project

"com.twitter" %% "storehaus-core" % storehausVersion,
"com.twitter" %% "chill" % chillVersion,
"com.twitter" %% "storehaus-algebra" % storehausVersion,
withCross("com.twitter" %% "util-core" % utilVersion)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this is needed, and we may be screwing up if we are not careful. We could dave duplicated classes.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the with cross isn't needed? The other usage(storm) uses it like this, so it won't make things 'worse' anyway I don't think?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think withCross IS needed, because util isn't published for scala 2.9.3. You won't be able to build without it, I don't think.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is, i just checked, no 2.9.3 util-core published :/

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cool. Just want to make sure we keep that right. Using withCross should be consistent in out stack. Thanks for checking.

johnynek added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2013
Moves shared code out of core/storm to the online package for use with o...
@johnynek johnynek merged commit 2845c5e into develop Oct 15, 2013
@johnynek johnynek deleted the feature/online-project branch October 15, 2013 17:29
snoble pushed a commit to snoble/summingbird that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants