Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing Django 3.1 items #558

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 19, 2021
Merged

Missing Django 3.1 items #558

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 19, 2021

Conversation

mkurnikov
Copy link
Member

@mkurnikov mkurnikov commented Jan 19, 2021

Closes #556

@sobolevn
Copy link
Member

sobolevn commented Jan 19, 2021

@mkurnikov have you seen our discussion in #439

Glad to see you 🙂

@mkurnikov
Copy link
Member Author

For the PR this comment #439 (comment) is valid, it doesn't break anything.

For the general case, I see this comment #439 (comment), is there anything done in that direction that I can look at?

@sobolevn
Copy link
Member

For the PR this comment #439 (comment) is valid, it doesn't break anything.

It might be a good way to go, because more and more users are reporting this. 3.1 is more and more used.

For the general case, I see this comment #439 (comment), is there anything done in that direction that I can look at?

No, this requires a lot of work, I didn't have the time for it.

@mkurnikov mkurnikov merged commit f074772 into typeddjango:master Jan 19, 2021
@mkurnikov mkurnikov deleted the jsonfield branch January 19, 2021 21:10
def get_internal_type(self): ...
def get_prep_value(self, value: Any): ...
def get_transform(self, name: Any): ...
def validate(self, value: Any, model_instance: Any) -> None: ...
def value_to_string(self, obj: Any): ...
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

-> str

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants