Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove duplicated types #262

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Nov 4, 2018
Merged

Remove duplicated types #262

merged 7 commits into from Nov 4, 2018

Conversation

henrikra
Copy link
Contributor

@henrikra henrikra commented Sep 20, 2018

This PR removes duplicated types in ValidationTypeOptions.ts because they can be imported from @types/validator. This way the types always match and we don't have to sync them manually.

Also I update @types/validator to 9.4.2 because I added options for isNumeric. PR is here DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped#28600

No breaking changes. Tell me what you guys think :)

Fixes #253

@henrikra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@NoNameProvided Can you check this out so we could merge this? :)

@henrikra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@19majkel94 How things usually go in this repo with PRs? How we get this merged?

@MichalLytek
Copy link
Contributor

@NoNameProvided is in charge here, I have no npm publish access 😕

@henrikra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@NoNameProvided This should be easy to review. Care to take a look? :)

@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
"typescript-validator"
],
"dependencies": {
"@types/validator": "9.4.2",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be in dev dependencies, but I will move it.

@NoNameProvided NoNameProvided merged commit 58a33e0 into typestack:master Nov 4, 2018
@NoNameProvided
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the contribution @henrikra!

@NoNameProvided NoNameProvided added this to the v0.9.2 milestone Nov 4, 2018
@henrikra
Copy link
Contributor Author

henrikra commented Nov 5, 2018

@NoNameProvided Thank you! Btw have guys though about adding some other guy with publish rights? Because usually people are not patient enough to wait over 2 months for their PR to be merged. I would suggest @19majkel94 :)

@MichalLytek
Copy link
Contributor

I think our team need more contributors and volunteers for this project as we have limited time for all of the open source projects 😞 Then others could review PRs and maintain the repo with only publishing responsibility on our side.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2020

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 5, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants