Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade express-validator from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1 #2

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link

@snyk-bot snyk-bot commented Jan 7, 2020

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade express-validator from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.
  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 9 days ago, on 2019-12-29.
Release notes
Package name: express-validator
  • 6.3.1 - 2019-12-29
    • #813 - don't use Symbol internally to avoid breaking express-validator reuse
  • 6.3.0 - 2019-11-24
    • #476 - Bring notEmpty validator back
    • #772, #776 - Add missing pt-BR mobile phone locale
    • #794, #795 - Make all properties available in all union branches of ValidationError
from express-validator GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: express-validator
  • ad34201 6.3.1
  • 303b5eb Don't use Symbol internally
  • 96eaea6 npm: run eslint with ignore file path
  • d82af97 docs: note that async custom validators must reject

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant