-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
3 changed files
with
23 additions
and
15 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
4af7aac
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I missed this, and although the peripheral.py I'm looking at today will be replaced by the new Peripheral work I think the auto-conversation to an int should not be in the library.
IMHO the bytes should be passed as the DBus byte array at level 100 and as a python array of bytes for levels 1 & 10, e.g. for level 100 I'm 'fixing' this for my app, which needs to accept a multi-byte command, simply as: