Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor code for speed and clarity #40

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

UltralyticsAssistant
Copy link
Member

@UltralyticsAssistant UltralyticsAssistant commented Jun 9, 2024

This pull request refactors the codebase to improve performance and readability. Key changes include:

  • Optimized various functions for faster execution.
  • Simplified complex logic for better understanding and maintenance.
  • Removed redundant code to streamline operations.
  • Improved code structure and organization.

These changes aim to enhance the overall quality and efficiency of the code.

🛠️ PR Summary

Made with ❤️ by Ultralytics Actions

🌟 Summary

Improved readability and efficiency by refining list and string manipulations within plotting and utility functions.

📊 Key Changes

  • Streamlined list comprehensions for color assignments and point filtering.
  • Simplified string formatting using f-strings.
  • Replaced verbose list operations with concise, Pythonic expressions.
  • Improved condition checks and border handling in image utility functions.
  • Refined loop variable names and redundant code segments.

🎯 Purpose & Impact

  • 🧹 Code Cleanliness: Enhanced code readability and maintainability.
  • 🚀 Performance: Potential minor performance gains due to more efficient list handling.
  • 🔧 Developer Experience: Easier for developers to understand and modify the codebase.

@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher deleted the refactor-20240609024357 branch June 9, 2024 00:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants