Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Entity search - take one #15951

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kjac
Copy link
Contributor

@kjac kjac commented Mar 27, 2024

Prerequisites

  • I have added steps to test this contribution in the description below

Description

This PR adds entity (item) search to the Management API. The "global" search known from V13 will be replaced with individual search endpoints that can be utilized by the client in a mix-and-match fashion.

Note that this is the first take on entity search, to get the ball rolling on the client implementation. The document, media and member search endpoints will be updated later on to use Examine for searching rather that the entity service. At the same time, user start nodes will be honoured by those search endpoints.

Testing this PR

  1. Ensure that all search endpoints return results as expected, matching entities by name (partial match/contains) or item key (exact match).
  2. Verify that the search endpoints return no results when searching for something that is not there.

Copy link
Member

@Zeegaan Zeegaan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works like a charm 🚀

@Zeegaan Zeegaan merged commit 96f2b17 into v14/dev Apr 2, 2024
16 of 17 checks passed
@Zeegaan Zeegaan deleted the v14/feature/entity-search-take-one branch April 2, 2024 08:40
@Zeegaan Zeegaan added the project/bellissima AKA "the new backoffice" label Apr 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
project/bellissima AKA "the new backoffice" release/14.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants