We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently we have 4 types:
ZeroTrieSimpleAscii
ZeroTriePerfectHash
ZeroTrieExtendedCapacity
ZeroTrie
I think we should consolidate these down to two types:
ZeroAsciiTrie
ZeroBytesTrie
OK?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Worth noting that the byte pattern of a ZeroAsciiTrie can be consumed by a ZeroBytesTrie which means it is forwards-compatible to switch between them.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Currently we have 4 types:
ZeroTrieSimpleAscii
ZeroTriePerfectHash
ZeroTrieExtendedCapacity
ZeroTriePerfectHash
but there is no size limitZeroTrie
I think we should consolidate these down to two types:
ZeroAsciiTrie
==ZeroTrieSimpleAscii
ZeroBytesTrie
==ZeroTrieExtendedCapacity
ZeroTriePerfectHash
because the ~5% perf benefit isn't worth keeping around a separate typeZeroTrie
because the type of trie should be determined by the programmer based on the nature of the data, not via a runtime switchOK?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: