Document proposed public.skipExportGlyphs lib key #84
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Denis mentioned that non-existent glyph names are harmless (and assist in finding bugs in the compiler), like in the glyphOrder list. |
benkiel
reviewed
Mar 8, 2019
Closed
|
This lgtm, @LettError and @typesupply? |
|
lgtm |
|
Looks good to me. |
|
Merge it! (I can't) |
|
Merged! |
|
Waaaah! I was about to amend the empty group sentence 😆 New PR I guess. |
This was referenced Mar 14, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #68.
I'm not sure it's necessary to impose set semantics on the list. Opinions?