Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(initrd): Add initializers for buildkitd connectors #931

Merged

Conversation

nderjung
Copy link
Member

Prerequisite checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines regarding submitting new changes to the project;
  • Tested your changes against relevant architectures and platforms;
  • Ran make fmt on your commit series before opening this PR;
  • Updated relevant documentation.

Description of changes

This commit adds initializers to buildkit dial connectors. It enables users the ability to use buildkit which is being run on alternative systems other than the host UNIX socket or a TCP socket.

These new connectors allow using buildkit over: ssh, Docker container, Dodman container, containerd container and a Kubernetes pod simply by specifying a relevant scheme. See here for details.

This commit adds initializers to buildkit dial connectors.  It enables
users the ability to use buildkit which is being run on alternative
systems other than the host UNIX socket or a TCP socket.

These new connectors allow using buildkit over: ssh, Docker container,
Dodman container, containerd container and a Kubernetes pod simply by
specifying a relevant scheme. See [0] for details.

[0]: https://github.com/moby/buildkit#containerizing-buildkit

Signed-off-by: Alexander Jung <alex@unikraft.io>
Copy link
Member

@craciunoiuc craciunoiuc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good here. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Cezar Craciunoiu cezar.craciunoiu@unikraft.io
Approved-by: Cezar Craciunoiu cezar.craciunoiu@unikraft.io

@craciunoiuc craciunoiuc merged commit 472cad2 into unikraft:staging Oct 26, 2023
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🚀 Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants