delete old version of diagram, as unnecessary

[jordandsullivan]

Description

In original branch to fix the name of the qse module in the diagram, the old version of the image was left in unnecessarily. Removing here.

---

License

• I license this contribution under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 3 and grant Unitary Fund the right to provide additional permissions as described in section 7 of the GNU GPL, version 3.

Before opening the PR, please ensure you have completed the following where appropriate.

• I added unit tests for new code.
• I used type hints in function signatures.
• I used Google-style docstrings for functions.
• I updated the documentation where relevant.
• Added myself / the copyright holder to the AUTHORS file

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.22%. Comparing base (2a41ad0) to head (732e12f).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2364   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.22%   98.22%           
=======================================
  Files          87       87           
  Lines        4059     4059           
=======================================
  Hits         3987     3987           
  Misses         72       72           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[natestemen]

Should we rename the diagram-v2 back to "diagram" in addition to deleting the old file?

I was reminded of this comic :)

[jordandsullivan]

Should we rename the diagram-v2 back to "diagram" in addition to deleting the old file?

I was reminded of this comic :)

Lol I don't have a strong preference on this. But tbf it's not like we're calling it "final version," just incrementing the version number so it's clear a previous version existed in case people still have it referenced somewhere.