Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-enable Matlab parser #46

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Re-enable Matlab parser #46

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

vhda
Copy link
Contributor

@vhda vhda commented Jun 24, 2014

Updated language mapping in testing.mak to guarantee that only mat*.m files are parsed with the Matlab parser.

@vhda
Copy link
Contributor Author

vhda commented Jul 6, 2014

Given the latest patches done by Masatake, this no longer makes sense.

@vhda vhda closed this Jul 6, 2014
masatake pushed a commit to masatake/ctags that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2020
Regexp supports Unicoe 9.0.0's \X

* meta character \X matches Unicode 9.0.0 characters with some workarounds
  for UTR universal-ctags#51 Unicode Emoji, Version 4.0 emoji zwj sequences.
  [Feature #12831] [ruby-core:77586]

The term "character" can have many meanings bytes, codepoints, combined
characters, and so on. "grapheme cluster" is highest one of such words,
which means user-perceived characters.
Unicode Standard Annex universal-ctags#29 UNICODE TEXT SEGMENTATION specifies how to
handle grapheme clusters (extended grapheme cluster).
But some specs aren't updated to current situation because Unicode Emoji
is rapidly extended without well definition.
It breaks the precondition of UTR#29 "Grapheme cluster boundaries can be
easily tested by looking at immediately adjacent characters". (the
sentence will be removed in the next version)
Though some of its detail are described in Unicode Technical Report universal-ctags#51
UNICODE EMOJI but it is not merged into UTR#29 yet.

http://unicode.org/reports/tr29/
http://unicode.org/reports/tr51/
http://unicode.org/Public/emoji/4.0/
masatake pushed a commit to masatake/ctags that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2020
masatake pushed a commit to masatake/ctags that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2020
masatake pushed a commit to masatake/ctags that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants