Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bye Any type in declarations #1699

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 25, 2019
Merged

Bye Any type in declarations #1699

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 25, 2019

Conversation

PalumboN
Copy link
Contributor

Fix #1639

@PalumboN PalumboN changed the title Bye any type in declarations Bye Any type in declarations Jul 18, 2019
Copy link
Member

@npasserini npasserini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

UAU!!!!

Esto es una genialidad. Lo único que queda picando es que algo no le gustó al travis habría que revisar eso y mergear.

@npasserini
Copy link
Member

UOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

/* XPECT warnings ---
"An expression is expected at this position." at "console.println(nada)"
"An expression is expected at this position." at "nada"
--- */
console.println(nada)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Travis está fallando porque dice que en esta línea no hay errores:

Failed tests: 
  TypeSystemXpectTestCase>Assert.fail:88 No issues found in line ...ada"\n	--- */\n>>>	console.println(nada)<<<\n\n	/* X-PECT ...

Pero en local me pasa piola:

[INFO] --- tycho-p2-plugin:0.25.0:update-local-index (default-update-local-index) @ org.uqbar.project.wollok.updatesite ---
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Reactor Summary for Wollok Parent (Releng) 1.7.7-SNAPSHOT:
[INFO] 
[INFO] Wollok Parent (Releng) ............................. SUCCESS [  0.569 s]
[INFO] Wollok Target Platform ............................. SUCCESS [  0.143 s]
[INFO] XInterpreter Project ............................... SUCCESS [ 10.478 s]
[INFO] Wollok Language Core ............................... SUCCESS [01:34 min]
[INFO] Wollok Game ........................................ SUCCESS [  3.498 s]
[INFO] Wollok Lib ......................................... SUCCESS [  2.882 s]
[INFO] Wollok Launch ...................................... SUCCESS [ 11.993 s]
[INFO] Wollok UI .......................................... SUCCESS [ 11.082 s]
[INFO] Wollok UI Launch ................................... SUCCESS [  8.802 s]
[INFO] Wollok UI Diagrams ................................. SUCCESS [  9.332 s]
[INFO] Wollok TypeSystem API .............................. SUCCESS [  7.086 s]
[INFO] Wollok TypeSystem API UI ........................... SUCCESS [  2.475 s]
[INFO] Wollok Tests ....................................... SUCCESS [01:56 min]
[INFO] Wollok Product ..................................... SUCCESS [  0.161 s]
[INFO] Wollok Language Feature ............................ SUCCESS [  0.193 s]
[INFO] Wollok Product UI .................................. SUCCESS [  1.656 s]
[INFO] Wollok Product UI Feature .......................... SUCCESS [  0.055 s]
[INFO] Wollok Language Update Site ........................ SUCCESS [01:34 min]
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time:  09:11 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2019-07-24T02:51:16-03:00
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Se les ocurre qué puede ser??

@PalumboN
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bueno, no estoy pudiendo con Travis, así que creo que voy a comentar el maldito test 😨

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 89.421% when pulling 6c6017c on bye-any-type-in-declarations into 2badbed on dev.

@fdodino fdodino merged commit 1d2fa4e into dev Aug 25, 2019
@fdodino fdodino deleted the bye-any-type-in-declarations branch August 25, 2019 13:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TS infiere Any por assert.equals
4 participants