Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 14, 2019. It is now read-only.

Czar Not Found #1211

Closed
minderfolden opened this issue Jul 3, 2019 · 8 comments
Closed

Czar Not Found #1211

minderfolden opened this issue Jul 3, 2019 · 8 comments

Comments

@minderfolden
Copy link

I'm getting a strange error that infinitely scrolls. Doesn't matter if I restart my planet; it's always there when I come back.

ames: czar at run.urbit.org: not found (b) ames: czar at run.urbit.org: not found (b) ames: czar at fun.urbit.org: not found (b) ames: czar at fun.urbit.org: not found (b)

I've |bonk'ed run eth-manage, etc. No idea where to go from here.

@joemfb
Copy link
Member

joemfb commented Jul 3, 2019

This normally just means domain-name resolution for these galaxies failed. Once you try to send a packet to a ship, %ames (the urbit network) will keep trying indefinitely (subject to backoff).

But I've never seen it repeat endlessly. Have you tried to send lots of packets to a variety of ships?

@minderfolden
Copy link
Author

unknown
Not to the extent that would make this happen. This happens all day long. I fire up the screen and I see hundreds of lines of it.

@vvisigoth
Copy link
Contributor

vvisigoth commented Jul 4, 2019 via email

@minderfolden
Copy link
Author

I'm not familiar with the "with the back off" saying. What do you mean?

@jfranklin9000
Copy link
Contributor

The time between retries increases.

@vvisigoth
Copy link
Contributor

vvisigoth commented Jul 4, 2019 via email

@vvisigoth
Copy link
Contributor

(mirrored from email)

I have your pier and ran it. Nothing seems amiss, no recurring errors, etc. why is this?

My guess (and some other engineers) is that vere (the runtime) has its own codepath for galaxy discovery and, thus, its own way of dealing with these requests. I'd guess that this is a deep bug in the vere runtime, not in your pier. This is good news and means that me using 1) a different ip and 2) a different instance of vere with its own cache, seemed to help.

@vvisigoth
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to close this since we have a preliminary work around and we're changing this codepath.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants