Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test change #2

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 9, 2012
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion applications/graph500/README-Grappa.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
# Graph500 for Grappa

Another straightforward change.

Graph500 is a fairly new benchmark/competition aimed at encouraging better irregular application performance. Right now, it consists of a single benchmark: breadth-first traversal of a graph structure to create a BFS tree (really just an array `numVertices` long where each element holds the parent of that node). (The next specification will include a Single-Source Shortest Path kernel as well). [Official specification](http://www.graph500.org/specifications)


Expand Down Expand Up @@ -50,4 +52,4 @@ To break that down a bit:

Other options for compiling, etc:
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weird, why is this here?


* Compile with DEBUG=1 to get debugging symbols, less variables optimized out, etc.
* Compile with DEBUG=1 to get debugging symbols, less variables optimized out, etc.
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions applications/graph500/softxmt/main.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@
#include <gperftools/profiler.h>
#endif

// test change
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, seems a bit superflous.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I DISAGREE


static int compare_doubles(const void* a, const void* b) {
double aa = *(const double*)a;
double bb = *(const double*)b;
Expand Down