Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About implementation of AdvEnt+MinEnt #7

Closed
changliu816 opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

About implementation of AdvEnt+MinEnt #7

changliu816 opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@changliu816
Copy link

Hi,

I implemented the AdvEnt+MinEnt (45.5 in paper) by combining advEnd and MinEnd together, but got 42.48 % instead.

For GTA5-> Cityscapes:
I saw the result for MinEnt + ER in paper. My question is that do you use +ER or class prior techniques with AdvEnd+MinEnt experiment ?

Could you please briefly clarify how you implement AdvEnd+MinEnt experiment ?

Best,
Chang

@tuanhungvu
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello @changliu816, we have not jointly trained AdvEnt + MinEnt in the paper (still you can try). The reported number is of the ensemble of the two models (see Section 4.2). To your second question, the MinEnt model used in this ensemble was (MinEnt + ER) in Table 1.
Best,
T-H

@tuanhungvu tuanhungvu added the question Further information is requested label Feb 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants