You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I implemented the AdvEnt+MinEnt (45.5 in paper) by combining advEnd and MinEnd together, but got 42.48 % instead.
For GTA5-> Cityscapes:
I saw the result for MinEnt + ER in paper. My question is that do you use +ER or class prior techniques with AdvEnd+MinEnt experiment ?
Could you please briefly clarify how you implement AdvEnd+MinEnt experiment ?
Best,
Chang
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello @changliu816, we have not jointly trained AdvEnt + MinEnt in the paper (still you can try). The reported number is of the ensemble of the two models (see Section 4.2). To your second question, the MinEnt model used in this ensemble was (MinEnt + ER) in Table 1.
Best,
T-H
Hi,
I implemented the AdvEnt+MinEnt (45.5 in paper) by combining advEnd and MinEnd together, but got 42.48 % instead.
For GTA5-> Cityscapes:
I saw the result for MinEnt + ER in paper. My question is that do you use +ER or class prior techniques with AdvEnd+MinEnt experiment ?
Could you please briefly clarify how you implement AdvEnd+MinEnt experiment ?
Best,
Chang
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: