-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 363
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
h2: Integrate h2_rxbuf_storage (6.0) #4004
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When running really massive runs, "-j180 -n10000" kind of things, the "rm -rf" of the tmpdir becomes the limiting factor. The new -C option sends that int nice(1)'ed child process.
The name implies that this is not for production usage.
Avoid VSB_printf for static strings Done with the following semantic patch for Coccinelle: @@ expression vsb, fmt; @@ - VSB_printf(vsb, fmt); + VSB_cat(vsb, fmt); This patch is available in the Varnish source tree.
This change increases the initial size and reduces the low watermark. RFC7540 says this: > Flow-controlled frames from the sender and WINDOW_UPDATE frames from > the receiver are completely asynchronous with respect to each other. > This property allows a receiver to aggressively update the window > size kept by the sender to prevent streams from stalling. The default parameters are very much on the low-latency aggressive updates end of the spectrum, which increases asynchronicity at the expense of determinism in test cases. The tweaks made by varnishtest allows basic tests to send a few request bodies before being bothered by window update race conditions. Test cases that cover h2 flow control or anything else related to window updates may reset parameters or pick other specific values. This frees us from a bunch of barriers where the purpose of mitigating this race was rarely even documented. This successfully passed the following test locally: git grep -Fl +http2 -- '*.vtc' | xargs bin/varnishtest/varnishtest -i -n100 -j32 We can hope that h2 test cases will be overall more stable from now on. Refs varnishcache#3442
This is an API for getting an arbitrary buffer through the stevedores. The stevedore in question may then deploy LRU nuking or other measures to control resource usage.
Conflicts: bin/varnishd/storage/storage_simple.c
In the same fashion as include/tbl/params.h for legibility.
And use that for logging purposes when a successfully opened h2 session ends. RX_JUNK is still the default session close reason when existing reasons aren't accurate enough. Fixes varnishcache#3393
The H/2 session thread does have a VSL buffer already set up, but the 'wrk->vsl' pointer was not set. This caused issue for e.g. LRU_NukeOne() as it wants to log. Set the buffer for the duration that the worker is dedicated as an H/2 session thread.
This implements stream data handling using a buffer between the H/2 session thread and each stream thread. This is needed to avoid head of line blocking on the session socket when a data frame is received for a stream thread that is not yet ready to receive it. The buffer used will have to be as large as the send window the peer expects at the time the stream is opened. This will typically be 65535 unless the h2_initial_window_size parameter has been changed. Stream window updates will then be issued only once data is removed from the buffer by the request body being consumed from the request handling thread, limited in size to what space is then available in the buffer. Conflicts: bin/varnishd/http2/cache_http2_proto.c
H2 streams waiting for request body data will timeout after timeout_idle seconds if no new data on the stream is being received. This will ensure that individual H2 streams can be reaped if there is no data received from the peer.
We have a strict min at the protocol default here. This is because we don't have the 'use settings only after peer ack' in place yet. If the value is lower than the protocol default, the very first stream could get a flow control error.
This makes it easier to not have to know exactly when and how many window updates to expect in a test case.
With the new request body data handling, Varnish changes behaviour significantly wrt to stream window updates sent to the client. Window updates will only be sent once the data is consumed by the client through the request body VFP handling. Test cases that rely on receiving a window update to sync the H/2 stream needs to be adopted.
This is the test case that fails if these changes aren't in tree. Note the commented out rxwinup commands that are necessary for the proper fail mode when run without the varnishtest window update changes.
According to the spec the padding is an 8-bit field, and fields should be treated as unsigned unless otherwise specified, which it is not for any of the padding related places. Allow varnishtest to generate padding up to 255 bytes long.
This was found lacking in our H2 implementation. Previously we would have included any padding bytes in the request body. Possibly it would have caused errors if there also was a C-L present, or more likely just corrupt request bodies. If the client sends nothing but padding bytes and ends up consuming the entire stream window with no actual request bytes buffered, the request thread side of things would not send any stream window updates. Handle this corner case by sending a window update from the session thread.
This parameter allows the user to choose which storage backend / stevedore that the H/2 receive buffers are allocated from. By default it uses Transient. Conflicts: bin/varnishd/mgt/mgt.h bin/varnishd/mgt/mgt_param.h bin/varnishd/mgt/mgt_param_tbl.c include/tbl/params.h
We don't need a delay, we need to sync operations.
mbgrydeland
approved these changes
Oct 18, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM on a cursory look
This was referenced Oct 18, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a port of #3661 preceded by cherry-picks of varnishtest changes it relies on (plus a cherry pick of a VTC stabilization made afterwards).
This is in preparation for a port of #3998 to the 6.0 branch.