Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding product #3

Merged
merged 3 commits into from May 17, 2022
Merged

Adding product #3

merged 3 commits into from May 17, 2022

Conversation

bond15
Copy link
Contributor

@bond15 bond15 commented May 16, 2022

No description provided.

@vcvpaiva
Copy link
Owner

this is not the product?

@vcvpaiva
Copy link
Owner

the category DialSets does not have a "par" connective, the operation can be defined (as you have it) but it's not a bifunctor, I think.

@vcvpaiva
Copy link
Owner

hi,
this bit of code is not right:
+ : DialSet → DialSet → DialSet
+(U ⋆ X ⇒2∋ α) ⅋ (V ⋆ Y ⇒2∋ β) =

  • (U × V) ⋆
  • X ⊎ Y ⇒2∋
  • λ{ ((u , v) , inj₁ x) → α (u , x)
  • ; ((u , v) , inj₂ y) → β (v , y)}
    

we do not have a "par" connective in DialSets.

@bond15
Copy link
Contributor Author

bond15 commented May 16, 2022

I thought this matched the comment here. Or is this a different operation?

×ₚ : DialSet → DialSet → DialSet
a ×ₚ b = record { U × V ; X + Y; choose(alpha, beta) }
-- want to choose a relation for a pair ((u,v), s), where s= (x, o) or (y, 1). if s=(x, 0) choose alpha, otherwise choose beta

@bond15
Copy link
Contributor Author

bond15 commented May 16, 2022

the x\_p name is an artifact from Poly.agda

@vcvpaiva
Copy link
Owner

vcvpaiva commented May 16, 2022 via email

@bond15
Copy link
Contributor Author

bond15 commented May 16, 2022

I'm available now. I can email a zoom link

@vcvpaiva
Copy link
Owner

vcvpaiva commented May 16, 2022 via email

@vcvpaiva vcvpaiva merged commit d782759 into vcvpaiva:master May 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants