-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
router.push("/") broken when intercepting routes as modal with parallel routes #51711
Comments
Relatable issue here: "use client";
import { useRouter } from "next/navigation";
import SigninContent from "@/app/(auth)/signin/content";
import { Dialog, DialogContent } from "@/components/ui/dialog";
export default function SigninModalContent() {
const router = useRouter();
const handleOnOpenChange = (open: boolean) => {
if (!open) {
router.back();
}
};
return (
<Dialog open={true} onOpenChange={handleOnOpenChange}>
<DialogContent>
<SigninContent />
</DialogContent>
</Dialog>
);
} |
I think I did something useEffect(() => {
if (path !== "/signin") {
setOpen(false);
} else {
setOpen(true);
}
}, [path]); |
To comment on main issue, I've seen a default.tsx with |
Check the import maybe be valide. |
Probably the same issue here: I fixed it through push to the parent directory first. I don't know why that works: https://github.com/TheLexoPlexx/senator/blob/ca7385cda942c2dced692bcf014783db6b8c9e86/app/einsatzplanung/%5Bid%5D/%40user/add/setUsersForm.tsx#L24C3-L25
|
This issue still persist in v13.5.2 |
Seems related to #49662 As noted by others in the ticket, routing back is working. But pushing new state does not. Even using the native |
Happening to me as well, I'm intercepting a route like |
Hey @samcx ! Thanks for addressing this issue, I just updated the code sandbox to the latest canary v14.0.5-canary.45 and I see the background component (not the modal) disappears when refreshing, idk if that's the expected behavior. Other than that I believe You can check out the code sandbox to make sure that's the expected behavior. If everything is alright I guess you can close both issues in next release. |
@pedro757 I can confirm this is a separate 🐛 with |
### What When a parallel segment in the current router tree is no longer "active" during a soft navigation (ie, no longer matches a page component on the particular route), it remains on-screen until the page is refreshed, at which point it would switch to rendering the `default.tsx` component. However, when revalidating the router cache via `router.refresh`, or when a server action finishes & refreshes the router cache, this would trigger the "hard refresh" behavior. This would have the unintended consequence of a 404 being triggered (which is the default behavior of `default.tsx`) or inactive segments disappearing unexpectedly. ### Why When the router cache is refreshed, it currently fetches new data for the page by fetching from the current URL the user is on. This means that the server will never respond with the data it needs if the segment wasn't "activated" via the URL we're fetching from, as it came from someplace else. Instead, the server will give us data for the `default.tsx` component, which we don't want to render when doing a soft refresh. ### How This updates the `FlightRouterState` to encode information about the URL that caused the segment to become active. That way, when some sort of revalidation event takes place, we can both refresh the data for the current URL (existing handling), and recursively refetch segment data for anything that was still present in the tree but requires fetching from a different URL. We patch this new data into the tree before committing the final `CacheNode` to the router. **Note**: I re-used the existing `refresh` and `url` arguments in `FlightRouterState` to avoid introducing more options to this data structure that is already a bit tricky to work with. Initially I was going to re-use `"refetch"` as-is, which seemed to work ok, but I'm worried about potential implications of this considering they have different semantics. In an abundance of caution, I added a new marker type ("`refresh`", alternative suggestions welcome). This has some trade-offs: namely, if there are a lot of different segments that are in this stale state that require data from different URLs, the refresh is going to be blocked while we fetch all of these segments. Having to do a separate round-trip for each of these segments could be expensive. In an ideal world, we'd be able to enumerate the segments we'd want to refetch and where they came from, so it could be handled in a single round-trip. There are some ideas on how to improve per-segment fetching which are out of scope of this PR. However, due to the implicit contract that `middleware.ts` creates with URLs, we still need to identify these resources by URLs. Fixes #60815 Fixes #60950 Fixes #51711 Fixes #51714 Fixes #58715 Fixes #60948 Fixes #62213 Fixes #61341 Closes NEXT-1845 Closes NEXT-2030
### What When a parallel segment in the current router tree is no longer "active" during a soft navigation (ie, no longer matches a page component on the particular route), it remains on-screen until the page is refreshed, at which point it would switch to rendering the `default.tsx` component. However, when revalidating the router cache via `router.refresh`, or when a server action finishes & refreshes the router cache, this would trigger the "hard refresh" behavior. This would have the unintended consequence of a 404 being triggered (which is the default behavior of `default.tsx`) or inactive segments disappearing unexpectedly. ### Why When the router cache is refreshed, it currently fetches new data for the page by fetching from the current URL the user is on. This means that the server will never respond with the data it needs if the segment wasn't "activated" via the URL we're fetching from, as it came from someplace else. Instead, the server will give us data for the `default.tsx` component, which we don't want to render when doing a soft refresh. ### How This updates the `FlightRouterState` to encode information about the URL that caused the segment to become active. That way, when some sort of revalidation event takes place, we can both refresh the data for the current URL (existing handling), and recursively refetch segment data for anything that was still present in the tree but requires fetching from a different URL. We patch this new data into the tree before committing the final `CacheNode` to the router. **Note**: I re-used the existing `refresh` and `url` arguments in `FlightRouterState` to avoid introducing more options to this data structure that is already a bit tricky to work with. Initially I was going to re-use `"refetch"` as-is, which seemed to work ok, but I'm worried about potential implications of this considering they have different semantics. In an abundance of caution, I added a new marker type ("`refresh`", alternative suggestions welcome). This has some trade-offs: namely, if there are a lot of different segments that are in this stale state that require data from different URLs, the refresh is going to be blocked while we fetch all of these segments. Having to do a separate round-trip for each of these segments could be expensive. In an ideal world, we'd be able to enumerate the segments we'd want to refetch and where they came from, so it could be handled in a single round-trip. There are some ideas on how to improve per-segment fetching which are out of scope of this PR. However, due to the implicit contract that `middleware.ts` creates with URLs, we still need to identify these resources by URLs. Fixes #60815 Fixes #60950 Fixes #51711 Fixes #51714 Fixes #58715 Fixes #60948 Fixes #62213 Fixes #61341 Closes NEXT-1845 Closes NEXT-2030
This closed issue has been automatically locked because it had no new activity for 2 weeks. If you are running into a similar issue, please create a new issue with the steps to reproduce. Thank you. |
Verify canary release
Provide environment information
Operating System: Platform: linux Arch: x64 Version: #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jun 4 12:31:46 UTC 2023 Binaries: Node: 18.16.0 npm: 9.6.7 Yarn: N/A pnpm: 8.6.1 Relevant packages: next: 13.4.7 eslint-config-next: 13.4.7 react: 18.2.0 react-dom: 18.2.0 typescript: 5.1.3
Which area(s) of Next.js are affected? (leave empty if unsure)
No response
Link to the code that reproduces this issue or a replay of the bug
https://codesandbox.io/p/sandbox/fast-bush-qlpdwm?file=%2Fapp%2Fhome%2Fpage.tsx
To Reproduce
use push("/") in a modal
Describe the Bug
This is what I get
Expected Behavior
I expect it to actually redirect me to the path I telling it to redirect
Which browser are you using? (if relevant)
No response
How are you deploying your application? (if relevant)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: