Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify a custom server doesn't mean you can't use an existing backend. #23200

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 18, 2021

Conversation

leerob
Copy link
Member

@leerob leerob commented Mar 18, 2021

I've been this confusion quite a few times.

So with my requirements, how big of a sin is it to use Next only for the frontend and get all its data, JWT tokens, etc. from my NodeJS backend by calling its respective APIs to said backend?

Even the docs mention that running a custom server is not a great idea...

Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 115674f into canary Mar 18, 2021
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the leerob-patch-1 branch March 18, 2021 17:31
flybayer pushed a commit to blitz-js/next.js that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2021
…d. (vercel#23200)

I've been this confusion quite a few times.

> So with my requirements, how big of a sin is it to use Next only for the frontend and get all its data, JWT tokens, etc. from my NodeJS backend by calling its respective APIs to said backend?

> Even the docs mention that running a custom server is not a great idea...
@vercel vercel locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 28, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants