-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use react-dom/server.browser
in Node.js
#33950
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ijjk
added
created-by: Chrome Aurora
PRs by the Google Chrome team: https://web.dev/aurora
type: next
labels
Feb 3, 2022
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
devknoll
changed the title
Remove Node.js stream rendering
Use Feb 3, 2022
ReadableStream
in Node.js
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Failing test suitesCommit: b45c6a5 test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/test/index.test.js
Expand output● concurrentFeatures - basic › should handle suspense error page correctly (node stream)
● concurrentFeatures - prod › should render 404 error correctly
● concurrentFeatures - dev › should render 404 error correctly
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
devknoll
changed the title
Use
Use Feb 4, 2022
ReadableStream
in Node.jsreact-dom/server.browser
in Node.js
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
devknoll
requested review from
ijjk,
padmaia,
shuding and
timneutkens
as code owners
February 4, 2022 17:07
shuding
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2022
huozhi
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2022
ijjk
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2022
Stats from current PRDefault Build (Increase detected
|
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
buildDuration | 17.1s | 17.2s | |
buildDurationCached | 6.6s | 6.6s | |
nodeModulesSize | 359 MB | 359 MB | -4.86 kB |
Page Load Tests Overall increase ✓
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
/ failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/ total time (seconds) | 3.284 | 2.993 | -0.29 |
/ avg req/sec | 761.18 | 835.32 | +74.14 |
/error-in-render failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/error-in-render total time (seconds) | 1.493 | 1.506 | |
/error-in-render avg req/sec | 1675.04 | 1659.77 |
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
450.HASH.js gzip | 179 B | 179 B | ✓ |
framework-HASH.js gzip | 42.2 kB | 42.2 kB | ✓ |
main-HASH.js gzip | 27.3 kB | 27.3 kB | ✓ |
webpack-HASH.js gzip | 1.44 kB | 1.44 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 71.2 kB | 71.2 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_app-HASH.js gzip | 1.37 kB | 1.37 kB | ✓ |
_error-HASH.js gzip | 194 B | 194 B | ✓ |
amp-HASH.js gzip | 312 B | 312 B | ✓ |
css-HASH.js gzip | 326 B | 326 B | ✓ |
dynamic-HASH.js gzip | 2.37 kB | 2.37 kB | ✓ |
head-HASH.js gzip | 350 B | 350 B | ✓ |
hooks-HASH.js gzip | 919 B | 919 B | ✓ |
image-HASH.js gzip | 4.94 kB | 4.94 kB | ✓ |
index-HASH.js gzip | 263 B | 263 B | ✓ |
link-HASH.js gzip | 2.19 kB | 2.19 kB | ✓ |
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 321 B | 321 B | ✓ |
script-HASH.js gzip | 383 B | 383 B | ✓ |
withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 318 B | 318 B | ✓ |
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip | 107 B | 107 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 14.3 kB | 14.3 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_buildManifest.js gzip | 459 B | 459 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 459 B | 459 B | ✓ |
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
index.html gzip | 528 B | 528 B | ✓ |
link.html gzip | 543 B | 543 B | ✓ |
withRouter.html gzip | 524 B | 524 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 1.59 kB | 1.59 kB | ✓ |
Default Build with SWC (Increase detected ⚠️ )
General Overall decrease ✓
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
buildDuration | 20.7s | 20.7s | |
buildDurationCached | 6.7s | 6.9s | |
nodeModulesSize | 359 MB | 359 MB | -4.86 kB |
Page Load Tests Overall increase ✓
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
/ failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/ total time (seconds) | 3.316 | 2.994 | -0.32 |
/ avg req/sec | 753.98 | 834.98 | +81 |
/error-in-render failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/error-in-render total time (seconds) | 1.472 | 1.518 | |
/error-in-render avg req/sec | 1698.39 | 1647.27 |
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
450.HASH.js gzip | 179 B | 179 B | ✓ |
framework-HASH.js gzip | 42.3 kB | 42.3 kB | ✓ |
main-HASH.js gzip | 27.4 kB | 27.4 kB | ✓ |
webpack-HASH.js gzip | 1.44 kB | 1.44 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 71.3 kB | 71.3 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_app-HASH.js gzip | 1.35 kB | 1.35 kB | ✓ |
_error-HASH.js gzip | 180 B | 180 B | ✓ |
amp-HASH.js gzip | 305 B | 305 B | ✓ |
css-HASH.js gzip | 321 B | 321 B | ✓ |
dynamic-HASH.js gzip | 2.36 kB | 2.36 kB | ✓ |
head-HASH.js gzip | 342 B | 342 B | ✓ |
hooks-HASH.js gzip | 911 B | 911 B | ✓ |
image-HASH.js gzip | 4.97 kB | 4.97 kB | ✓ |
index-HASH.js gzip | 256 B | 256 B | ✓ |
link-HASH.js gzip | 2.21 kB | 2.21 kB | ✓ |
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 314 B | 314 B | ✓ |
script-HASH.js gzip | 375 B | 375 B | ✓ |
withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 309 B | 309 B | ✓ |
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip | 107 B | 107 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 14.3 kB | 14.3 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_buildManifest.js gzip | 459 B | 459 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 459 B | 459 B | ✓ |
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
index.html gzip | 532 B | 532 B | ✓ |
link.html gzip | 545 B | 545 B | ✓ |
withRouter.html gzip | 526 B | 526 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 1.6 kB | 1.6 kB | ✓ |
natew
pushed a commit
to natew/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2022
Instead of branching rendering based on Node.js and browser/web runtimes, we should just use the web version for now, which can run as-is on versions >=16.5.0 of Node.js, polyfilling `ReadableStream` on older versions when necessary. There are a few potential downsides to this, as React is less able to optimize flushing and execution. We can revisit that in the future though if desired.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead of branching rendering based on Node.js and browser/web runtimes, we should just use the web version for now, which can run as-is on versions >=16.5.0 of Node.js, polyfilling
ReadableStream
on older versions when necessary.There are a few potential downsides to this, as React is less able to optimize flushing and execution. We can revisit that in the future though if desired.