Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use react-dom/server.browser in Node.js #33950

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Feb 4, 2022

Conversation

devknoll
Copy link
Contributor

@devknoll devknoll commented Feb 3, 2022

Instead of branching rendering based on Node.js and browser/web runtimes, we should just use the web version for now, which can run as-is on versions >=16.5.0 of Node.js, polyfilling ReadableStream on older versions when necessary.

There are a few potential downsides to this, as React is less able to optimize flushing and execution. We can revisit that in the future though if desired.

@ijjk ijjk added created-by: Chrome Aurora PRs by the Google Chrome team: https://web.dev/aurora type: next labels Feb 3, 2022
@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@devknoll devknoll changed the title Remove Node.js stream rendering Use ReadableStream in Node.js Feb 3, 2022
@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Feb 4, 2022

Failing test suites

Commit: b45c6a5

test/integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/test/index.test.js

  • concurrentFeatures - basic > should handle suspense error page correctly (node stream)
  • concurrentFeatures - dev > should render 404 error correctly
  • concurrentFeatures - prod > should render 404 error correctly
Expand output

● concurrentFeatures - basic › should handle suspense error page correctly (node stream)

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: "custom-404-pagenext_streaming_data"
Received: null

  151 |       `document.querySelector('#__next').textContent`
  152 |     )
> 153 |     expect(hydrationContent).toBe('custom-404-pagenext_streaming_data')
      |                              ^
  154 |
  155 |     error404Page.restore()
  156 |   })

  at Object.<anonymous> (integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/test/index.test.js:153:30)

● concurrentFeatures - prod › should render 404 error correctly

expect(received).toContain(expected) // indexOf

Expected substring: "custom-404-page"
Received string:    "Internal Server Error"

  340 |     const pathNotFoundHTML = await renderViaHTTP(context.appPort, '/not-found')
  341 |
> 342 |     expect(path404HTML).toContain('custom-404-page')
      |                         ^
  343 |     expect(pathNotFoundHTML).toContain('custom-404-page')
  344 |   })
  345 |

  at Object.<anonymous> (integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/test/index.test.js:342:25)

● concurrentFeatures - dev › should render 404 error correctly

thrown: "Exceeded timeout of 90000 ms for a test.
Use jest.setTimeout(newTimeout) to increase the timeout value, if this is a long-running test."

  336 |   })
  337 |
> 338 |   it('should render 404 error correctly', async () => {
      |   ^
  339 |     const path404HTML = await renderViaHTTP(context.appPort, '/404')
  340 |     const pathNotFoundHTML = await renderViaHTTP(context.appPort, '/not-found')
  341 |

  at runBasicTests (integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/test/index.test.js:338:3)
  at integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/test/index.test.js:298:3
  at Object.<anonymous> (integration/react-streaming-and-server-components/test/index.test.js:264:1)

@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@devknoll devknoll changed the title Use ReadableStream in Node.js Use react-dom/server.browser in Node.js Feb 4, 2022
@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@devknoll devknoll marked this pull request as ready for review February 4, 2022 17:07
@devknoll devknoll requested a review from huozhi as a code owner February 4, 2022 17:07
@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Feb 4, 2022

Stats from current PR

Default Build (Increase detected ⚠️)
General Overall decrease ✓
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
buildDuration 17.1s 17.2s ⚠️ +103ms
buildDurationCached 6.6s 6.6s ⚠️ +35ms
nodeModulesSize 359 MB 359 MB -4.86 kB
Page Load Tests Overall increase ✓
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
/ failed reqs 0 0
/ total time (seconds) 3.284 2.993 -0.29
/ avg req/sec 761.18 835.32 +74.14
/error-in-render failed reqs 0 0
/error-in-render total time (seconds) 1.493 1.506 ⚠️ +0.01
/error-in-render avg req/sec 1675.04 1659.77 ⚠️ -15.27
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
450.HASH.js gzip 179 B 179 B
framework-HASH.js gzip 42.2 kB 42.2 kB
main-HASH.js gzip 27.3 kB 27.3 kB
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.44 kB 1.44 kB
Overall change 71.2 kB 71.2 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 1.37 kB 1.37 kB
_error-HASH.js gzip 194 B 194 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 312 B 312 B
css-HASH.js gzip 326 B 326 B
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 2.37 kB 2.37 kB
head-HASH.js gzip 350 B 350 B
hooks-HASH.js gzip 919 B 919 B
image-HASH.js gzip 4.94 kB 4.94 kB
index-HASH.js gzip 263 B 263 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.19 kB 2.19 kB
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 321 B 321 B
script-HASH.js gzip 383 B 383 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 318 B 318 B
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip 107 B 107 B
Overall change 14.3 kB 14.3 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 459 B 459 B
Overall change 459 B 459 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
index.html gzip 528 B 528 B
link.html gzip 543 B 543 B
withRouter.html gzip 524 B 524 B
Overall change 1.59 kB 1.59 kB

Default Build with SWC (Increase detected ⚠️)
General Overall decrease ✓
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
buildDuration 20.7s 20.7s ⚠️ +48ms
buildDurationCached 6.7s 6.9s ⚠️ +194ms
nodeModulesSize 359 MB 359 MB -4.86 kB
Page Load Tests Overall increase ✓
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
/ failed reqs 0 0
/ total time (seconds) 3.316 2.994 -0.32
/ avg req/sec 753.98 834.98 +81
/error-in-render failed reqs 0 0
/error-in-render total time (seconds) 1.472 1.518 ⚠️ +0.05
/error-in-render avg req/sec 1698.39 1647.27 ⚠️ -51.12
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
450.HASH.js gzip 179 B 179 B
framework-HASH.js gzip 42.3 kB 42.3 kB
main-HASH.js gzip 27.4 kB 27.4 kB
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.44 kB 1.44 kB
Overall change 71.3 kB 71.3 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 1.35 kB 1.35 kB
_error-HASH.js gzip 180 B 180 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 305 B 305 B
css-HASH.js gzip 321 B 321 B
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 2.36 kB 2.36 kB
head-HASH.js gzip 342 B 342 B
hooks-HASH.js gzip 911 B 911 B
image-HASH.js gzip 4.97 kB 4.97 kB
index-HASH.js gzip 256 B 256 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.21 kB 2.21 kB
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 314 B 314 B
script-HASH.js gzip 375 B 375 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 309 B 309 B
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip 107 B 107 B
Overall change 14.3 kB 14.3 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 459 B 459 B
Overall change 459 B 459 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary azukaru/next.js x-rm-node-stream Change
index.html gzip 532 B 532 B
link.html gzip 545 B 545 B
withRouter.html gzip 526 B 526 B
Overall change 1.6 kB 1.6 kB
Commit: f7e3c7f

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 0b1d5e1 into vercel:canary Feb 4, 2022
natew pushed a commit to natew/next.js that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2022
Instead of branching rendering based on Node.js and browser/web runtimes, we should just use the web version for now, which can run as-is on versions >=16.5.0 of Node.js, polyfilling `ReadableStream` on older versions when necessary.

There are a few potential downsides to this, as React is less able to optimize flushing and execution. We can revisit that in the future though if desired.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 7, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
created-by: Chrome Aurora PRs by the Google Chrome team: https://web.dev/aurora type: next
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants