Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dataset is rarely treated as __EMPTY__ in test_nested (tck). can't reproduce for now. #4608

Closed
xtcyclist opened this issue Sep 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
affects/none PR/issue: this bug affects none version. need info Solution: need more information (ex. can't reproduce) priority/low-pri Priority: low process/done Process of bug severity/minor Severity of bug type/bug Type: something is unexpected

Comments

@xtcyclist
Copy link
Contributor

xtcyclist commented Sep 2, 2022

Describe the bug (required)

image

While executing YIELD 1 AS number INTERSECT YIELD 2 AS number;, the CI may run into the above error, in which an operand is trated as the Type::EMPTY.

Your Environments (required)

  • OS: Linux nebula-dev-84 5.4.0-122-generic
  • Compiler: clang++-14
  • CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8352Y CPU @ 2.20GHz
  • Commit id: 4738331

How To Reproduce(required)

To run the test, pytest -k "test_nested" .

But this error rarely happens. It cannot be reproduced for now. It should be a real bug. But now sure where the real problem is.

Expected behavior

This query should be executed successfully and return an empty resultset.

Additional context

@xtcyclist xtcyclist added the type/bug Type: something is unexpected label Sep 2, 2022
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie added this to the v3.3.0 milestone Sep 2, 2022
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie added the need info Solution: need more information (ex. can't reproduce) label Sep 14, 2022
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie added the priority/low-pri Priority: low label Sep 26, 2022
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie removed this from the v3.3.0 milestone Oct 26, 2022
@jinyingsunny jinyingsunny added the severity/minor Severity of bug label Nov 11, 2022
@HarrisChu HarrisChu added the affects/none PR/issue: this bug affects none version. label Dec 1, 2022
@Sophie-Xie
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe fixed in #4822

@xtcyclist
Copy link
Contributor Author

This test is skipped by #4817 for the CI.

It runs ok offline. Cannot reproduce it. Close this for now.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the process/fixed Process of bug label Dec 12, 2022
@HarrisChu HarrisChu added the process/done Process of bug label Jan 9, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the process/fixed Process of bug label Jan 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
affects/none PR/issue: this bug affects none version. need info Solution: need more information (ex. can't reproduce) priority/low-pri Priority: low process/done Process of bug severity/minor Severity of bug type/bug Type: something is unexpected
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants