Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix Issue3649 #3967

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 3, 2022
Merged

fix Issue3649 #3967

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 3, 2022

Conversation

cangfengzhs
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

  • bug
  • feature
  • enhancement

What problem(s) does this PR solve?

Issue(s) number:

#3649

Description:

How do you solve it?

Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, design document, etc:

Checklist:

Tests:

  • Unit test(positive and negative cases)
  • Function test
  • Performance test
  • N/A

Affects:

  • Documentation affected (Please add the label if documentation needs to be modified.)
  • Incompatibility (If it breaks the compatibility, please describe it and add the label.)
  • If it's needed to cherry-pick (If cherry-pick to some branches is required, please label the destination version(s).)
  • Performance impacted: Consumes more CPU/Memory

Release notes:

vertex count in show stats will counted by vertex key instead of tag key.

@cangfengzhs cangfengzhs requested review from critical27 and a team March 2, 2022 08:02
while (vertexIter && vertexIter->valid()) {
spaceVertices++;
vertexIter->next();
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not handled correctly

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please ignore the comments above, I see that vertexkey is written by default in AddVerticesProcessor.

@cangfengzhs cangfengzhs changed the title Issue3649 fix Issue3649 Mar 3, 2022
@critical27 critical27 added the ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test label Mar 3, 2022
@critical27 critical27 merged commit 772c29c into vesoft-inc:master Mar 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants