Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix storage job #4762

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 21, 2022
Merged

fix storage job #4762

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 21, 2022

Conversation

SuperYoko
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

  • bug
  • feature
  • enhancement

What problem(s) does this PR solve?

Issue(s) number:

Description:

image

1666256587362_D1C32631-0A05-4f22-9824-B2E8AAD7EAF6

How do you solve it?

fill space and job id in storage job executor

Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, design document, etc:

Checklist:

Tests:

  • Unit test(positive and negative cases)
  • Function test
  • Performance test
  • N/A

Affects:

  • Documentation affected (Please add the label if documentation needs to be modified.)
  • Incompatibility (If it breaks the compatibility, please describe it and add the label.)
  • If it's needed to cherry-pick (If cherry-pick to some branches is required, please label the destination version(s).)
  • Performance impacted: Consumes more CPU/Memory

Release notes:

Please confirm whether to be reflected in release notes and how to describe:

ex. Fixed the bug .....

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ class StorageJobExecutor : public JobExecutor {
}

JobDescription getJobDescription() override {
JobDescription ret;
JobDescription ret{space_, jobId_, cpp2::JobType::UNKNOWN};
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SuperYoko SuperYoko Oct 20, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JobType is not used in storage job executor and call line. Set to unknown.

@SuperYoko SuperYoko added the ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test label Oct 20, 2022
@SuperYoko SuperYoko mentioned this pull request Oct 20, 2022
11 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@panda-sheep panda-sheep left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good

@critical27 critical27 merged commit 92e9a08 into vesoft-inc:master Oct 21, 2022
Sophie-Xie added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
Co-authored-by: Sophie <84560950+Sophie-Xie@users.noreply.github.com>
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie added the cherry-pick-v3.3 PR: need cherry-pick to this version label Oct 21, 2022
Sophie-Xie added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
* logging error if any error in step (#4759)

Co-authored-by: Sophie <84560950+Sophie-Xie@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix storage job (#4762)

Co-authored-by: Sophie <84560950+Sophie-Xie@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix issue 4765 (#4768)

* Avoid full scan of match when there is an Relational In predicate (#4748)

* Avoid match full scan when has in predicate

fix

small fix

add test case

small change

add test cases

small fix

fmt

* small delete

Co-authored-by: Sophie <84560950+Sophie-Xie@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Harris.Chu <1726587+HarrisChu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Xing <90179377+SuperYoko@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: jie.wang <38901892+jievince@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kyle.cao <kyle.cao@vesoft.com>
@SuperYoko SuperYoko deleted the fix_job_failed_handle branch March 28, 2023 06:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-v3.3 PR: need cherry-pick to this version ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants