Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix issue1527(pruning properties) #5106

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 27, 2022

Conversation

nevermore3
Copy link
Contributor

@nevermore3 nevermore3 commented Dec 23, 2022

What type of PR is this?

  • bug
  • feature
  • enhancement

What problem(s) does this PR solve?

Issue(s) number:

close #4954
close https://github.com/vesoft-inc/nebula-ent/issues/1959
close https://github.com/vesoft-inc/nebula-ent/issues/1527

Description:

How do you solve it?

Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, design document, etc:

Checklist:

Tests:

  • Unit test(positive and negative cases)
  • Function test
  • Performance test
  • N/A

Affects:

  • Documentation affected (Please add the label if documentation needs to be modified.)
  • Incompatibility (If it breaks the compatibility, please describe it and add the label.)
  • If it's needed to cherry-pick (If cherry-pick to some branches is required, please label the destination version(s).)
  • Performance impacted: Consumes more CPU/Memory

Release notes:

Please confirm whether to be reflected in release notes and how to describe:

ex. Fixed the bug .....

@nevermore3 nevermore3 added the ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test label Dec 23, 2022
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie added the priority/hi-pri Priority: high label Dec 26, 2022
| id | name | dependencies | operator info |
| 7 | Aggregate | 6 | |
| 6 | Project | 5 | |
| 5 | AppendVertices | 4 | { "props": "[{\"props\":[\"_tag\"],\"tagId\": 3}, {\"props\":[\"_tag\"],\"tagId\": 4}, {\"props\":[\"_tag\"],\"tagId\": 5}]" } |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

better to remove the tagId field in plan since it depends on runtime context.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
# Copyright (c) 2021 vesoft inc. All rights reserved.
#
# This source code is licensed under Apache 2.0 License.
@jmq
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cleanup

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

xtcyclist
xtcyclist previously approved these changes Dec 26, 2022
@xtcyclist xtcyclist merged commit cdcc89c into vesoft-inc:master Dec 27, 2022
@nevermore3 nevermore3 deleted the fix_issue1668 branch December 28, 2022 07:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority/hi-pri Priority: high ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing vertex properties in match result
5 participants