You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I fixed a bug today with these timings, which I believe makes those results in the database wrong. After my fix, the rates are now similar between cuda/opencl, whereas previously there was a 10^3 difference.
I'm throwing this out there for suggestions about what to do with the results database.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Seems like it should be easy enough to detect which ones are wrong, with
that size of magnitude error? If so, I'd be fine with just changing the
database.
Seems like it should be easy enough to detect which ones are wrong, with
that size of magnitude error? If so, I'd be fine with just changing the
database.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #42 (comment).
Yeah, no. (Not possible anyway.) But I'll estimate the right values since we know the math behind the the error and update results.csv (marking them as estimates). Assigning to myself.
Yeah, no. (Not possible anyway.) But I'll estimate the right values since
we know the math behind the the error and update results.csv (marking them
as estimates). Assigning to myself.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #42 (comment).
I fixed a bug today with these timings, which I believe makes those results in the database wrong. After my fix, the rates are now similar between cuda/opencl, whereas previously there was a 10^3 difference.
I'm throwing this out there for suggestions about what to do with the results database.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: