-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Separate go code and docker image configuration #386
Comments
Do you have a suggestion what would work well for your use case? Would publishing binaries separately from Docker images do the trick or you had something else in mind? |
Thats something I had in mind, yes. So I could base my docker image on centos, ubuntu or any other OS. There seems to be some issues with DNS configuration on alpine image. https://github.com/gliderlabs/docker-alpine/blob/master/docs/caveats.md |
I think I should have it done by the end of next week. I hope that's OK. |
Yeah, thats fine. Thanks for the greate work. |
I'll have to delay the work on this for a week. I had too much on my plate and could not find enough time. |
Available in the release https://github.com/vfarcic/docker-flow-proxy/releases/tag/17.12.17-87. Can you please try out the binaries and let me know if that's what you were looking for? |
Have you thought about separating the docker-flow-proxy go code compilation and distribution from docker image. My issue is that I would like to use different base for docker-flow-proxy, alpines DNS causes issues and it would be easier to base the proxy image from our own corporate base image.
I know that we could do it right now as well, but we would have to fork the whole go source code as well, which is not ideal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: