[SPARK-42003][SQL] Reduce duplicate code in ResolveGroupByAll

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Reduce duplicate code in ResolveGroupByAll by moving the group by expression inference into a new method.

### Why are the changes needed?

Code clean up

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No
### How was this patch tested?

Existing UT

Closes apache#39523 from gengliangwang/refactorAll.

Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveGroupByAll.scala

@@ -47,25 +47,40 @@ object ResolveGroupByAll extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
     }
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Returns all the grouping expressions inferred from a GROUP BY ALL aggregate.
+   * The result is optional. If Spark fails to infer the grouping columns, it is None.
+   * Otherwise, it contains all the non-aggregate expressions from the project list of the input
+   * Aggregate.
+   */
+  private def getGroupingExpressions(a: Aggregate): Option[Seq[Expression]] = {
+    val groupingExprs = a.aggregateExpressions.filter(!_.exists(AggregateExpression.isAggregate))
+    // If the grouping exprs are empty, this could either be (1) a valid global aggregate, or
+    // (2) we simply fail to infer the grouping columns. As an example, in "i + sum(j)", we will
+    // not automatically infer the grouping column to be "i".
+    if (groupingExprs.isEmpty && a.aggregateExpressions.exists(containsAttribute)) {
+      None
+    } else {
+      Some(groupingExprs)
+    }
+  }
+
   override def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan.resolveOperatorsUpWithPruning(
     _.containsAllPatterns(UNRESOLVED_ATTRIBUTE, AGGREGATE), ruleId) {
     case a: Aggregate
       if a.child.resolved && a.aggregateExpressions.forall(_.resolved) && matchToken(a) =>
       // Only makes sense to do the rewrite once all the aggregate expressions have been resolved.
       // Otherwise, we might incorrectly pull an actual aggregate expression over to the grouping
       // expression list (because we don't know they would be aggregate expressions until resolved).
-      val groupingExprs = a.aggregateExpressions.filter(!_.exists(AggregateExpression.isAggregate))
+      val groupingExprs = getGroupingExpressions(a)
 
-      // If the grouping exprs are empty, this could either be (1) a valid global aggregate, or
-      // (2) we simply fail to infer the grouping columns. As an example, in "i + sum(j)", we will
-      // not automatically infer the grouping column to be "i".
-      if (groupingExprs.isEmpty && a.aggregateExpressions.exists(containsAttribute)) {
-        // Case (2): don't replace the ALL. We will eventually tell the user in checkAnalysis
-        // that we cannot resolve the all in group by.
+      if (groupingExprs.isEmpty) {
+        // Don't replace the ALL when we fail to infer the grouping columns. We will eventually
+        // tell the user in checkAnalysis that we cannot resolve the all in group by.
         a
       } else {
-        // Case (1): this is a valid global aggregate.
-        a.copy(groupingExpressions = groupingExprs)
+        // This is a valid GROUP BY ALL aggregate.
+        a.copy(groupingExpressions = groupingExprs.get)
       }
   }
 
@@ -94,8 +109,7 @@ object ResolveGroupByAll extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
    */
   def checkAnalysis(operator: LogicalPlan): Unit = operator match {
     case a: Aggregate if a.aggregateExpressions.forall(_.resolved) && matchToken(a) =>
-      val noAgg = a.aggregateExpressions.filter(!_.exists(AggregateExpression.isAggregate))
-      if (noAgg.isEmpty && a.aggregateExpressions.exists(containsAttribute)) {
+      if (getGroupingExpressions(a).isEmpty) {
         operator.failAnalysis(
           errorClass = "UNRESOLVED_ALL_IN_GROUP_BY",
           messageParameters = Map.empty)