Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pydeck: Correct JL2 dependency bug #4652

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 5, 2020
Merged

pydeck: Correct JL2 dependency bug #4652

merged 5 commits into from
Jun 5, 2020

Conversation

ajduberstein
Copy link
Collaborator

For #

Background

Change List

Copy link
Collaborator

@kylebarron kylebarron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is to fix my oversight. In #4573, I moved @jupyter-widgets/base to peerDependencies but somehow forgot to remove it from dependencies or messed up a rebase.

It's interesting the diff is so large. Maybe @jupyter-widgets/base was being resolved twice?

Or it looks like now it isn't resolved at all, since it's a peerDependency, and should be provided by jupyter lab upon install.

I did test as a peerDependency in the original PR (#4573)

@kylebarron
Copy link
Collaborator

Well CI is failing. I suppose @jupyter-widgets/base can't be a peerDependency?

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 5, 2020

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+2.8%) to 83.32% when pulling 2e4e11e on ajd/stamp into 0d60ffc on master.

"@loaders.gl/3d-tiles": "^2.1.5",
"@loaders.gl/core": "^2.1.5",
"@loaders.gl/csv": "^2.1.5",
"@jupyter-widgets/base": "^1.1.10 || ^2 || ^3",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be helpful to alphabetize this and put it before @loaders.gl

@ajduberstein ajduberstein merged commit 1cecdca into master Jun 5, 2020
@ajduberstein ajduberstein deleted the ajd/stamp branch June 5, 2020 17:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants