Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

WIP: Better netem qdisc support #706

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

WIP: Better netem qdisc support #706

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

stv0g
Copy link
Contributor

@stv0g stv0g commented Oct 22, 2021

This PR adds:

  • support for the rate limiting attributes of the netem qdisc
  • support for delays, jitter and rate values larger than an unsigned 32 bit integer

@stv0g stv0g mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2021
Open
3 tasks
@stv0g
Copy link
Contributor Author

stv0g commented Dec 20, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Hi @vishvananda,

Do we have a chance to get this minor change merged?

@vishvananda vishvananda changed the base branch from master to main January 12, 2022 22:28
@vishvananda vishvananda reopened this Jan 12, 2022
@vishvananda
Copy link
Owner

Looks like you have an error in CI: Error: ./qdisc_linux.go:757:50: cannot use ticks (type uint32) as type uint64 in argument to tick2Time

@vishvananda
Copy link
Owner

also you'll need to squash this into one commit please

@stv0g
netem: add support for rate-limiting and 64-bit sized jitter and late…
f99b725 
…ncy attributes

Signed-off-by: Steffen Vogel <post@steffenvogel.de>
@stv0g stv0g changed the title Better netem qdisc support WIP: Better netem qdisc support Jan 14, 2022
@aboch
Copy link
Collaborator

aboch commented Aug 23, 2024

@stv0g

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@stv0g @vishvananda @aboch