-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
timeout operator #163
Labels
Comments
Added implementation in branch It just needs some tests + docs, to finish fully. |
I'm now thinking about, maybe, adding a second parameter - optional callback that's called only when the timeout was triggered, so the timeout event can be logged, for instance. |
vitaly-t
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 15, 2022
The operator has been fully finished, and released with v2.0.0-beta.8 |
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
New operator
timeout
that ends iteration after a specified number of milliseconds:@RebeccaStevens What do you think? 馃槈
UPDATE
Previously, I thought this was achievable via operator stop, but then I realized it would not account for the time spent getting the first value, so it's no good.
This new operator simplifies it a lot, and it accounts for the first iteration value also.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: