Split pipe function into explicit sync and async versions

[RebeccaStevens]

As discussed in #131

The original pipe function has not been removed, it just is no longer able to infer types automatically.

[vitaly-t]

This will need to be updated to cater for the previous PR ;)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 99.70% // Head: 99.40% // Decreases project coverage by -0.29% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (00a5ebe) compared to base (21f39cb).
Patch coverage: 96.96% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #132      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.70%   99.40%   -0.30%     
==========================================
  Files          42       42              
  Lines        1334     1339       +5     
  Branches      278      278              
==========================================
+ Hits         1330     1331       +1     
- Misses          2        3       +1     
- Partials        2        5       +3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/types/index.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/pipe.ts	91.30% <87.50%> (-8.70%)	⬇️
src/helpers.ts	97.36% <100.00%> (ø)
src/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ops/async/delay.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ops/async/retry.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ops/async/throttle.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ops/async/wait.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ops/count.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ops/every.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 15 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[vitaly-t]

Is this one now ready for the merge?

I'm seeing some conflicts now, after previous PR-s were merged.

[RebeccaStevens]

There's a bit more to do with regards to types but I might do that in another PR.
A bunch more tests should be added too (specifically to test types) but that's probably another PR too.
I guess it should be all good to merge this one.