Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "[release-16.0] MoveTables: add flag to specify that routing rules should not be created when a movetables workflow is created" #13899

Merged

Conversation

rohit-nayak-ps
Copy link
Contributor

@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps commented Aug 30, 2023

Reverts #13858.

This has been implemented in v18 at #13895.

@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Aug 30, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Aug 30, 2023
Signed-off-by: Rohit Nayak <rohit@planetscale.com>
@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps force-pushed the revert-13858-rohit/movetables-no-routing-rules branch from 4f6a2e2 to fab5609 Compare August 31, 2023 09:26
@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request labels Aug 31, 2023
@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps requested a review from a team August 31, 2023 18:41
@dbussink dbussink merged commit a682c1e into release-16.0 Sep 4, 2023
221 of 222 checks passed
@dbussink dbussink deleted the revert-13858-rohit/movetables-no-routing-rules branch September 4, 2023 07:32
@hmaurer hmaurer mentioned this pull request Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants