Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.0] First-class multiline string support #301

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2019
Merged

[3.0] First-class multiline string support #301

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2019

Conversation

GrahamCampbell
Copy link
Collaborator

@GrahamCampbell GrahamCampbell commented Jan 2, 2019

Closes #271.

@GrahamCampbell GrahamCampbell merged commit dcf11a4 into vlucas:master Jan 2, 2019
@GrahamCampbell GrahamCampbell deleted the multiline branch January 2, 2019 17:22
@GrahamCampbell GrahamCampbell changed the title First-class multiline string support [3.0] First-class multiline string support Jan 28, 2019
@lyrixx
Copy link

lyrixx commented Mar 14, 2019

Seriously? You did not even cherry-pick (/ squashed) @Korbeil's code from #271?

@GrahamCampbell
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yeh, because the code is not the same.

@GrahamCampbell
Copy link
Collaborator Author

If it were the same, I'd have just merged the original.

@lyrixx
Copy link

lyrixx commented Mar 14, 2019

It's not really fare. What I usually do is to reopen a new PR with the "broken" code and fix it in another commit, for example https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/26651/commits

@GrahamCampbell
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It wasn't that simple though, because the original PR was no longer applicable due to merge conflicts, so I was simpler to just rewrite the implementation.

@begueradj
Copy link

Could you please explain "multi line environment variable " ?

@lyrixx
Copy link

lyrixx commented Nov 14, 2019

You can have a look at the test suite to understand how it works

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants