Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

eid-mw: update to 5.0.23 #31477

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 14, 2021
Merged

eid-mw: update to 5.0.23 #31477

merged 1 commit into from Jun 14, 2021

Conversation

PoroCYon
Copy link
Contributor

@PoroCYon PoroCYon commented Jun 14, 2021

Right after the PR for the 5.0.22 update got merged, I heard this from the eid-mw maintainer:

Side note though: 5.0.22 contains a small, but critical, bug in the validation code of the eid-viewer, which means that under certain circumstances, cards with corrupt data may be considered valid eID cards. The bug was fixed in 5.0.23. Please update to that :-)

Sorry for the inconvenience.


General

Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?

  • I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me
  • I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR

Does it build and run successfully?

(Please choose at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build. More are better.)

  • I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (x86_64-glibc)
  • I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
    • aarch64-musl
    • armv7l
    • armv6l-musl

@ericonr
Copy link
Member

ericonr commented Jun 14, 2021

No worries, thanks.

@ericonr ericonr merged commit 73b4e73 into void-linux:master Jun 14, 2021
@PoroCYon PoroCYon deleted the eid-mw-5.0.22 branch June 14, 2021 11:27
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 12, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants