Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gnutls: update to 3.7.3 #34742

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

gnutls: update to 3.7.3 #34742

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cinerea0
Copy link
Contributor

Testing the changes

  • I tested the changes in this PR: YES

@cinerea0
Copy link
Contributor Author

This includes the changes in #34268 before being closed by the author. I have been using this for 12 days at the time of writing with no problems.

@ericonr
Copy link
Member

ericonr commented Jan 11, 2022

Any specific reason for moving to the non-stable branch (I think)?

I'm not sure what our policy here has been.

@cinerea0
Copy link
Contributor Author

I didn't realize that gnutls followed the same versioning conventions as GNOME projects where odd minor versions aren't considered stable releases, but looking at the release notes for 3.6.16 vs 3.7.2 it definitely does. I created this PR after the old one was closed because the new version is required to update filezilla. Since that isn't a package that needs to be kept perfectly up to date I understand if that's not a good reason to ignore policy.

srcpkgs/gnutls/template Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
srcpkgs/gnutls/template Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cinerea0
Copy link
Contributor Author

@paper42 This PR is for a version of gnutls that is not from the stable branch (3.6.16 release notes say "stable", 3.7.3 release notes do not). Is that alright?

@paper42
Copy link
Member

paper42 commented Jan 20, 2022

@paper42 This PR is for a version of gnutls that is not from the stable branch (3.6.16 release notes say "stable", 3.7.3 release notes do not). Is that alright?

Earlier today this was discussed on IRC in #xbps, most other distributions consider 3.7 to be stable enough including Debian and some applications now require this version, so I think we should just merge this update.

@cinerea0 cinerea0 changed the title gnutls: update to 3.7.2 gnutls: update to 3.7.3 Jan 20, 2022
@ericonr
Copy link
Member

ericonr commented Jan 20, 2022

@paper42 or anyone else, feel free to merge.

If @cinerea0 wants, documenting that despite being a "next" version it's what everyone uses in the commit message might be a good idea.

@ericonr ericonr closed this in 5b19696 Jan 20, 2022
@ericonr
Copy link
Member

ericonr commented Jan 20, 2022

Did it myself to speed it up. Thanks!!

@cinerea0 cinerea0 deleted the gnutls branch January 20, 2022 05:39
Sqvid pushed a commit to Sqvid/void-packages that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2022
The 3.7.x branch is currently documented as "next", while 3.6.x is
"stable". However, all distros, including Debian stable, use the 3.7.x
branch; and other libraries and applications already require new
functionality provided only in the 3.7 branch.

Closes: void-linux#34742 [via git-merge-pr]
ElDifinitivo pushed a commit to ElDifinitivo/void-packages that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2022
The 3.7.x branch is currently documented as "next", while 3.6.x is
"stable". However, all distros, including Debian stable, use the 3.7.x
branch; and other libraries and applications already require new
functionality provided only in the 3.7 branch.

Closes: void-linux#34742 [via git-merge-pr]
ElDifinitivo pushed a commit to ElDifinitivo/void-packages that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2022
The 3.7.x branch is currently documented as "next", while 3.6.x is
"stable". However, all distros, including Debian stable, use the 3.7.x
branch; and other libraries and applications already require new
functionality provided only in the 3.7 branch.

Closes: void-linux#34742 [via git-merge-pr]
ElDifinitivo pushed a commit to ElDifinitivo/void-packages that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2022
The 3.7.x branch is currently documented as "next", while 3.6.x is
"stable". However, all distros, including Debian stable, use the 3.7.x
branch; and other libraries and applications already require new
functionality provided only in the 3.7 branch.

Closes: void-linux#34742 [via git-merge-pr]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants