Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Gemfile.local from git #104

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2023

Conversation

ekohl
Copy link
Member

@ekohl ekohl commented Mar 23, 2023

A local file checked into git is contradictory. This merges the file into Gemfile.

A local file checked into git is contradictory. This merges the file
into Gemfile.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 23, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (c2885e4) 85.61% compared to head (25e793a) 85.61%.

❗ Current head 25e793a differs from pull request most recent head dede53b. Consider uploading reports for the commit dede53b to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #104   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.61%   85.61%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines         292      292           
=======================================
  Hits          250      250           
  Misses         42       42           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@bastelfreak bastelfreak merged commit 3811e54 into voxpupuli:master Mar 24, 2023
@ekohl ekohl deleted the remove-gemfile.local branch March 24, 2023 10:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants