Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes and tests for strict variables #87

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 24, 2016

Conversation

alexjfisher
Copy link
Member

@alexjfisher alexjfisher commented Nov 21, 2016

No description provided.

Will help us get fixes for strict variables right.
Not much to see, but better than nothing.
Fixes voxpupuli#82
Using `getvar()` as it has better compatibility than `defined()`
See https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-4072 for example.
@alexjfisher
Copy link
Member Author

Looks like build is failing due to a recent stdlib regression.

@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ matrix:
- rvm: 1.9.3
env: PUPPET_VERSION="~> 3.0" STRICT_VARIABLES="yes" CHECK=test
- rvm: 1.9.3
env: PUPPET_VERSION="~> 3.6.0" STRICT_VARIABLES="yes" CHECK=test
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is only in this PR temporarily. I'll get rid of it before merging.

@alexjfisher alexjfisher changed the title WIP: Fixes and tests for strict variables Fixes and tests for strict variables Nov 21, 2016
@alexjfisher
Copy link
Member Author

Supercedes #83 and #84

@sammcj
Copy link
Contributor

sammcj commented Nov 24, 2016

Awesome, thanks all, will test and report back.

@sammcj
Copy link
Contributor

sammcj commented Nov 25, 2016

Looks good all, was able to implement the latest release to master (note: there is no tag, you might want to update this to 2.2.3 or something) without any problems.

@alexjfisher
Copy link
Member Author

@sammcj #90 Enjoy!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants