Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Puppet 4.0 support #106

Closed
wants to merge 21 commits into from
Closed

Puppet 4.0 support #106

wants to merge 21 commits into from

Conversation

ffquintella
Copy link
Contributor

This a new version with some minor bugfixes

@@ -26,11 +26,11 @@
"requirements": [
{
"name": "pe",
"version_requirement": ">=3.7.0 <4.0.0"
"version_requirement": ">=3.7.0 <4.3.0"
Copy link
Sponsor Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

4.3.0 was just released, is there a particular reason to stay below that version when testing?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pretty sure we can do <5.0.0 here

@rnelson0
Copy link
Sponsor Member

rnelson0 commented Dec 2, 2015

I don't have any technical comments but did add a few syntax comments. Also see #96 (comment), same failures are occuring here.

tykeal and others added 2 commits December 4, 2015 14:19
Signed-off-by: Andrew Grimberg <tykeal@bardicgrove.org>
The format parameter needs to not have a leading . or all of the spec
tests need to be fixed to pass it in. As removing it is the simpler
option this does that.

Secondly, the calculated file names for the deploy need to have the file
extension . added. Also, the calculated file name for pre-7.0.0 had been
destroyed, this puts it back to what it should be.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Grimberg <tykeal@bardicgrove.org>
@bramwelt bramwelt mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2015
Fix deployment files to unblock spec
@jyaworski
Copy link
Member

Hello:

What's the status of this PR?

@igalic
Copy link
Contributor

igalic commented Mar 9, 2016

@ffquintella can we convince you to rebase & squash this pr?

@ffquintella
Copy link
Contributor Author

Igalic.

For me it's ok. I will close de PR. And as soon as I have some extra time I will watch into rebasing

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants