Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pluggable display argument providers #18

Closed
nadako opened this issue Aug 22, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Pluggable display argument providers #18

nadako opened this issue Aug 22, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@nadako
Copy link
Member

nadako commented Aug 22, 2016

A lot of frameworks have their own project files and an option to generate display arguments from those files. It would probably be nice to support those as an alternative to haxe.displayConfigurations. To make it generic, I thought we could maybe support pluggable "display arguments provider" system", where haxe.displayConfigurations config is just one of them, but there's also others, like the one for openfl/lime that would be watching project.xml and re-read display arguments with lime display <platform>. I think we don't even need to touch language server for that.

While this isn't implemented, we should steal/adapt the "framework notes" table from vscode-haxe:
https://github.com/jcward/vscode-haxe#framework-notes

@Gama11
Copy link
Member

Gama11 commented Mar 2, 2017

Adding the "blocked" label here for now, see #96 (comment) and #79.

Gama11 added a commit to vshaxe/haxe-language-server that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2017
Gama11 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2017
Gama11 added a commit to vshaxe/vshaxe-build that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2017
Causing issues with the display argument provider API (vshaxe/vshaxe#18).
@nadako
Copy link
Member Author

nadako commented Jul 13, 2017

This is now implemented.

@nadako nadako closed this as completed Jul 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants