Too ?many?

[ncannasse]

I just discovered a new Haxe syntax :)

[Gama11]

? is used for printing monomorphs, because the Unknown<0> we had previously looks stupid. :) We even highlight this somewhat nicely in hover hints:

Open to better suggestions though. Ideally we just wouldn't ever have any monomorphs in completion. ;)

[ncannasse]

how come it's a Monomorph if we're having a String constant ?
Also, I would prefer in the case an argument is a monomorph to simply remove ":?" instead of displaying it

[ncannasse]

(for the cases it's just a monomorph, I understand the need for ? in type parameters)

[Gama11]

That may be an option. Why it's a monomorph, no idea. @Simn? :)

[nadako]

I think that's what I originally did for function arguments (just don't display anything for unknown types)

[Simn]

Not sure why that's a monomorph, might be a return_partial_type thing.