Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Functional Identity Report #53

Closed
jandrieu opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Functional Identity Report #53

jandrieu opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
accepted Accepted work items/registries proposed work items Abstracts for potential work for approval by the community group

Comments

@jandrieu
Copy link
Contributor

The work item is to adopt & revise the Rebooting the Web of Trust Functional Identity Primer for publication as a community group report.
https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot6-santabarbara/blob/master/topics-and-advance-readings/functional-identity-primer.md

Leader: Joe Andrieu @jandrieu
Co-sponsors: Christopher Allen @ChristopherA

@jandrieu jandrieu added the proposed work items Abstracts for potential work for approval by the community group label Jan 15, 2019
@kimdhamilton kimdhamilton added the action: review next Items for discuss at next CCG meeting label Jan 18, 2019
@mwherman2000
Copy link

Joe, some content on Functional Identities can be found here in this presentation from the Pan-Canadian Trust Framework...

There’s also some interesting terminology in this Pan-Canadian Trust Framework deck: foundation identity, functional identity, trusted representations, trusted digital identity, …

Checkout this slide and the few slides that follow: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BI3HuvluE_nd7k3hqeLIX6L7sQFtoGrjO07TFl0iZGo/edit#slide=id.p2

Cheers

@jandrieu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Interesting. They are using the term differently than we are. It might be worth calling out to contrast what we mean from what they are saying, but that may also be a distraction. We probably don't want to get in a terminology war about it.

@andrewhughes3000
Copy link

andrewhughes3000 commented Jan 23, 2019 via email

@jandrieu
Copy link
Contributor Author

I chatted with Tim today and we're going to discuss how we might align terminology.

@kimdhamilton kimdhamilton added accepted Accepted work items/registries and removed action: review next Items for discuss at next CCG meeting labels Jan 29, 2019
@kimdhamilton
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted Accepted work items/registries proposed work items Abstracts for potential work for approval by the community group
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants